fdgh8988
Region: US
Friday 05 June 2026 02:09:10 GMT
5860
160
8
1
Music
Download
Comments
DEAL WITH IT 2.0 :
There are no comprehensive national statistics tracking exactly how many police officers have been disciplined, fired, or prosecuted for raiding or searching the wrong home over the last 30 years. The vast majority of these cases are settled civilly out of court with taxpayers covering the costs, leaving individual officers largely protected by qualified immunity.The Scale of the ProblemFrequency: Researchers and civil rights groups, such as the Institute for Justice, report that mistaken "wrong-house" raids happen regularly across the U.S.. The Cato Institute estimates that tens of thousands of dynamic entries (such as SWAT or no-knock raids) occur annually.No official database: Federal agencies like the FBI or the Department of Justice do not maintain a centralized, public database solely categorizing how many times innocent people's homes are targeted by mistake.The Barrier to AccountabilityQualified Immunity: This legal doctrine protects government officials from liability in civil lawsuits unless their conduct violates clearly established statutory or constitutional rights. This means victims rarely secure a ruling directly penalizing the individual officer.Supreme Court Precedent: Accountability for these mistakes often takes years to litigate. For example, in a high-profile case where FBI agents raided an innocent family's home in Atlanta in 2017, victims had to fight sweeping federal immunity all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Court ruled that victims can sue the government for mistaken raids, which serves as a step toward accountability.Criminal Charges: Criminal charges against officers involved in mistaken home raids are exceptionally rare. Unless there is proven malicious intent or extreme criminal negligence, most incidents are categorized legally as tragic mistakes rather than prosecutable crimes.Civil Settlements and ConsequencesWhile officers are infrequently held criminally accountable or stripped of their qualified immunity, police departments and municipalities often face civil liability. Taxpayers pay millions in damages for these botched raids:Chicago Settlements: Following a wrongful raid on a family's home in 2018, the city of Chic
2026-06-05 12:02:30
3
ROYALTY😉👑 :
....a damaged bumper?.....ain't no way
2026-06-05 12:50:16
2
realist😎💯 :
this is why I hate police can’t give me a good enough reason I’ll just go on with my day
2026-06-05 12:53:22
0
dadbod1425 :
Just sue them
2026-06-05 13:35:50
2
joegray868 :
ALL DIRTY
2026-06-05 11:45:16
1
DEAL WITH IT 2.0 :
NAZI GESTAPO!!! it's all about money. and the public defender will say. this will go eaier if you plead guilty. 5 years of probation and $20K dollars in fines. it's all about making people pay fines who can't afford to pay rent. these are Nazi Gestapo. not seving the American tax payers. and protecting the constitution. since the United states broke over 370 treaties. ARTICLE VI SECTION II THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE. THE HIGHEST LAW OF THE LAND. TREATIES. LAW ENFORCEMENT NO LONGER FOLLWS THEIR OATH, THE LAW OR THE CONSTITUTION. POV IMO FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY.
2026-06-05 12:00:08
1
DEAL WITH IT 2.0 :
Robert Jordan is the plaintiff from the landmark 1996 legal case Jordan v. City of New London. He was rejected from becoming a police officer in New London, Connecticut, after scoring a 33 on the Wonderlic Personnel Test (the equivalent of an IQ of 125), which the department deemed too high.The DetailsThe Applicant: Robert Jordan was a 46-year-old college graduate and former law student.The Test & Score: He took the standardized Wonderlic test—a cognitive ability and problem-solving exam. He scored a 33 out of 50, which equates to an IQ of 125.The Department's Policy: The New London Police Department had a long-standing policy to only interview applicants who scored between 20 and 27.The Rationale: The city argued that candidates who scored "too high" would get bored with mundane police routines and quit shortly after the department invested expensive academy training in them (estimated at $25,000 per recruit).The LawsuitThe Claim: Jordan sued the city in federal court, alleging that the policy violated his constitutional rights and constituted discrimination based on intelligence.The Ruling: The federal district court, and later the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York, ruled against Jordan.The Legal Logic: The court did not necessarily rule that the city's policy was smart or wise. Instead, it ruled that the city was not violating equal protection laws because they applied the exact same maximum IQ standard evenly to all applicants—regardless of race, gender, or class. The courts acknowledged the city’s rationale of reducing job turnover as legally valid.After exhausting his appeals, Jordan gave up his fight to become a New London cop and took a position as a prison guard, noting that his new job required exactly the kind of critical thinking the police department had deemed
2026-06-05 12:00:27
1
DEAL WITH IT 2.0 :
The $3.2 billion figure comes from a comprehensive investigation by The Washington Post into misconduct payouts at 25 of the largest police and sheriff's departments in the United States between 2010 and 2020.You can explore the findings and view the data directly through these resources:The Investigation: Read the full findings in The Washington Post: The hidden billion-dollar cost of repeated police misconduct.Searchable Database: Look up specific departments and track total payouts via The Washington Post Database.Key Takeaways from the Data:Major Drivers: Nearly 80% of the $3.2 billion total was driven by just three massive departments: New York City, Chicago, and Los Angeles.Repeat Offenders: A small fraction of officers were responsible for a massive portion of the costs. Over 7,600 officers across these 25 departments had multiple payouts, accounting for $1.5 billion of the total.Broader Tracking: To track ongoing civil settlements and public funding for police lawsuits on a national scale, you can also utilize the Legal Defense Fund's National Police Funding
2026-06-05 12:00:18
2
To see more videos from user @g3s7b0, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
