✨Nelly✨
Region: US
Friday 05 June 2026 22:07:18 GMT
1032
238
27
19
Music
Download
Comments
BloodlineElite❌️🇺🇲Freedmen :
Wow great work Nelly 👏🏾
2026-06-06 05:05:14
5
anayalove32 :
The larger number of the crania are from sites in central and eastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island, and show on analysis that the dominant element in all this area is, most unexpectedly, the Proto-Negroid!” — The Racial History of Man (1923: 419-20) In plain language, Dixon claimed that the earliest populations of New England bore Black-like (Negroid) physical traits — not Mongoloid or European ones. This conclusion, coming from a Harvard scientist during Jim Crow America, challenged the racial hierarchy and the story of who first populated the land. And then, as if by design, his work disappeared.
2026-06-06 09:56:18
1
Joshua_the_Just :
Thank you 💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
2026-06-06 15:55:52
1
BAW1MONEY :
I love her 😁
2026-06-06 08:58:26
0
rootsthatremember :
👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 We are indeed the descendants of the Paleo Americans and those Population Y signals are the foundation of our ancestry! Funny how we can prove it using the very tools that were built to hide it. They messed up giving us access to that site lol It has it’s baked in biases too but I’ve been finding workarounds. Will be posting a demonstration video soon.
2026-06-06 04:58:58
6
The Nagual :
There’s no such thing as “outdated science”. From literature I’ve personally written… What is compounded source documentation? It is this cultures criteria and protocol in how “factual evidence/scientific truth” is to be determined and established that dictates how we define ourselves and the world around us. After developing the entire infrastructure of “education” (compulsory indoctrination) and monopolizing publishing for hundreds of years, the laws of scientific journal publishing was established. In order to publish a journal entry one requires previous “peer reviewed” journal entries to substantiate the recent submission. Each papers validity must be substantiated by previous studies dating all the way back to the inception of the journal such as the NIH National Institute of Health. Hence the phrase I have coined “compounded source documentation”. “Peer review” is often the “standard criteria” indoctrinated so called “scholars” use to push white supremacist propaganda they assume verifies whether documentation has genuine substance or not. These bachelors, masters degrees and PhD’s often tout, “YEAH, but is it peer reviewed?” as though it is the end all be all. But what exactly does it mean to be “peer reviewed”? Because I have already verified the process it’s easy to gauge the “oppositions” awareness, or rather lack there of. This valid question is rarely answered among pseudo scholars attempting to negate literature I present that contradicts their bias narratives even though my literature comes from PhD’s licensed and insured by the same companies with degrees from the same institutions who authorized their accreditation.
2026-06-06 15:23:54
2
deesourh :
🔥🔥🔥
2026-06-06 06:53:39
0
✨Nelly✨ :
Ya’ll wanted us to take a DNA test soooo bad and when we do and dissect it, ya’ll wanna bring up that we said it was for entertainment purposes, to avoid engaging with the evidence. And yes, those ancestry kits, AncestryDNA, 23andMe etc are still “for entertainment purposes” Because they give you percentages based on reference panels that were built with bias. But GEDmatch? The one that matters, that’s different from those ancestry kits, that's raw data and not an estimate. That's your actual DNA, chromosome by chromosome, segment by segment. That's where you find the Population Y signal. The Botocudo matches. The Australasian markers that don't show up in those “entertainment purpose only” commercial reports. Or not found in any modern Native American population.
2026-06-05 22:08:34
18
Dawn :
How do we know the Black Americans today are the direct ancestors of the ‘Dark skinned, melanated, copper colored’ people the early Europeans interacted with OR they just SIMPLY have MIXED ANCESTRY? 🫢
2026-06-06 06:45:48
0
jonatelive :
I had to push back with ChatGPT cuz it only wanted to search “Black” as Africans to disconnect from the truth about our ancient bloodlines… When I asked Chat to search NON Africans with Black or Negro features, the intelligence finally opened up with the facts and archeology that this sista is talking about 💡🖤
2026-06-06 17:00:55
1
anayalove32 :
The Material Evidence Still Sitting in Cambridge Despite the purging of Dixon’s notes, the Peabody Museum continues to hold thousands of human remains including crania from Massachusetts and Rhode Island, the very regions Dixon studied. Federal NAGPRA filings and ProPublica’s Repatriation Database confirm that Harvard retains over 6,000 Native American ancestors, many still unrepatriated. Among them are skulls from Wampanoag, Narragansett, and Nipmuc territories, the same cultural zone where Dixon found his “Proto-Negroid” type. The evidence, in other words, never left Cambridge. What disappeared was the language — the racial classification that unsettled America’s racial mythology.
2026-06-06 09:58:35
2
anayalove32 :
Why “Proto-Negroid” Threatened the Colonial Narrative To understand the stakes, consider what Dixon’s observation implied: If early New England populations displayed “Negroid” traits, then Black or dark-skinned peoples were indigenous to the region. That undermined both the idea of Africans as foreign captives and the notion of Indians as a wholly separate “Mongoloid race.” It blurred the color line between “Black” and “Indian” — a line that colonial law and federal Indian policy depended on to manage land, labor, and identity. By the 1920s, U.S. anthropology was a gatekeeper for race policy. So, Dixon’s “Proto-Negroid” claim wasn’t just an academic disagreement — it was a threat to the bureaucratic architecture of racial separation. Erasing him protected the fiction that Negroid features in Indigenous peoples came after contact, through slavery or intermarriage, rather than before contact as part of the continent’s original human diversity.
2026-06-06 09:59:48
2
🪶🏹 High Tier Atlantean🪶💧🩸 :
they were scared of the Atlanteans being not white 😂 that's why everything got buried after 1900 in the USA
2026-06-06 13:12:32
1
anayalove32 :
The Re-Labeling: From Proto-Negroid to Mongoloid Within two years of Dixon’s death, the language of his findings began to vanish from official discourse. Summaries in American Anthropologist (1925) described his New England skulls as “early Mongoloid.” University bibliographies dropped the word Negroid entirely. Even the Peabody Museum’s inventory cards where Dixon’s data had been recorded were later edited to classify the same skulls as “Algonkian” or “Mongoloid.” This isn’t an accident of taxonomy. It’s a pattern. Labeling the remains “Mongoloid” kept them compatible with the Bering Strait migration narrative (Asiatic origins only) and erased any suggestion of an Negroid-looking or dark-complexioned population in early New England. In other words: Harvard sanitized Dixon’s evidence to preserve the racial story America wanted.
2026-06-06 09:57:02
1
DeSuanP :
Stop shopping at all Asian businesses everyone remember there are 48 Asian countries so that the HINDU, Bangladesh , Pakistan, Kazakhstan that’s mostly all middle eastern business. Do your research on products and who makes them before you buy them !!! ITS THAT IMPORTANT THAT THIS LAND AND RESOURCES GOES BACK TO THE INDIGENOUS OF THIS LAND THAT IS US MELANATED WHO KNOW WHO THEY ARE!
2026-06-06 17:04:26
0
To see more videos from user @miz_nelly1111, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
