@linoya_friedman: People watching walk in New York birthday edition! 🩵💕 which pair do you think I got?

Linoya
Linoya
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Sunday 07 June 2026 13:35:09 GMT
197867
24754
86
842

Music

Download

Comments

fergz01.w
Mfer :
That’s Carrie Bradshaw
2026-06-08 03:36:43
409
marnessou
Oumss :
Love
2026-06-07 19:03:14
812
l.y.d.i.a.aaa
l.y.d.i.a.aaa :
To live in NYC🥺
2026-06-10 18:03:15
0
soosupersam
sammiee :
The girl in the car 🤩 ultimate cool girl
2026-06-07 17:03:28
877
arbcqen04
Amina :
I love how watching ppl turned into a influenced purchase lol
2026-06-09 14:55:33
25
mahasiddiqui27
Maha Siddiqui :
I wonder if people are okay with you making their videos 🫠
2026-06-10 05:08:26
5
milabrest
Mila :
Girl please post more content like this
2026-06-09 22:34:28
29
underfinfluence
underfinfluence :
I love this content
2026-06-07 14:21:42
153
kellyvnnc
kellyvnnc 🇨🇦 :
Hope you got the blue flats 🥰
2026-06-07 23:23:23
70
rehmonamour
rehmonamour :
So you’re saying I should move to New York City?
2026-06-07 13:44:00
75
roeebokobza
Roee Bokobza :
From street inspo to actual purchase!!
2026-06-07 15:53:03
42
purpleheart__6
purpleheart__6 :
Akuzi shwapha
2026-06-08 20:35:26
15
hlahlamba_mjita
egodeath_ :
love that you didn't show their faces💕
2026-06-08 16:23:38
10
roby3049
RobinRae :
Those flats are amazing such a updated style love ❤️
2026-06-10 14:26:37
0
username667891
user7117432929929446 :
Why is your vid geotagged as Miami?
2026-06-08 14:39:34
0
vrwrrt
𝓼 :
obsessed
2026-06-10 14:21:57
0
kd_sisters_style
Kd sisters :
I love this 🙈
2026-06-10 11:00:09
0
hajerb5
hajerbhr :
she irl influenced you
2026-06-08 10:56:43
7
naheemahazordesigns
Naheemah | Fashion & Style ✨ :
Valentino Rockstud’s are 100% back
2026-06-09 03:19:03
14
_jinmorales
Jin Morales :
Women adoring fellow women. This should be the case—always!! PS: everyone was like magazine cover models 🥰🥰
2026-06-08 03:55:54
6
cherilove410
cherilove410 :
Where I live, it would be all the diff ways we style our sweatpants 🤣
2026-06-07 23:35:54
12
ashleyskoo
Ashley S Koo :
Literally inspo all around
2026-06-07 21:33:43
6
maricag_122
Rica :
The blue flats ❤️
2026-06-09 16:18:08
4
saleintothe90s
The last vcr//saleintothe90s :
Dang that antique Mercedes
2026-06-09 00:51:15
3
To see more videos from user @linoya_friedman, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

NEW RUSSIAN RECORD AND 6TH THE FASTEST TIME HISTORY (50 M FREE, MEN – 21.06 LC) 🌍 WR: Cameron McEvoy @cam_mcevoy — 20.88 (20 Mar)  🏆 RR: Egor Kornev @egorkornevvv , @baydalova_olga — 21.06 (9 June) — 6th fastest result in history Comparing Cameron McEvoy’s world record (20.88) and Egor Kornev’s Russian record (21.06) on the 50 m freestyle. The race contrasts two distinct elite technical models — a short‑stroke, high‑frequency model (McEvoy) and a long‑stroke, highly rhythmic model (Kornev). ❗️Key numbers - Final gap:  - Start (0–15 m): Kornev faster by 0.27 s; start velocity higher by 0.20 m/s. - Average distance velocity (15–45 m): McEvoy +0.05 m/s. - Critical zone 25–35 m: McEvoy +0.11 m/s. - Final 5 m: McEvoy +0.11 m/s. - Stroke length: Kornev 1.31 m vs McEvoy 1.05 m (+0.26 m). - Stroke rate: Kornev 74 cycles/min vs McEvoy 97 cycles/min; Kornev’s stroke‑rate deviation ≈ 0.2 cycles/min. - Effective Velocity Coefficient (EVC): McEvoy +31.28 units over Kornev. Phase‑by‑phase analysis 1) Start (0–15 m) Kornev’s start is an outstanding competitive asset: he gains 0.27 s and a clear velocity edge early. In a 50 m sprint the start constitutes a large proportion of the race profile, so this advantage is strategically and practically significant. 2) Clean‑swimming sections (15–45 m) On 15–25 m and 35–45 m the two athletes show almost identical effective speeds (difference ≈ 0.01 m/s), indicating comparable cycle effectiveness in those windows. The defining divergence occurs on 25–35 m: McEvoy is faster by 0.11 m/s. That transitional zone demands maintenance of power and minimization of velocity loss — and here McEvoy converts his mechanics into higher useful speed. 3) Finish (last 5 m) McEvoy again demonstrates superiority (+0.11 m/s). His model sustains or increases pressure on the water under maximal fatigue, producing a stronger terminal velocity and determining the final time advantage. DM us “Egor VS WR” and get the full tactical analysis! ❤️‍🔥 📸 Ph @rus_aquatics , @world_aquatics  📹 Video @matchtv_channel  📈 Analysis @dmitrii_drozhetskii  #smartswimcrafttactics #swimanalysis #wr
NEW RUSSIAN RECORD AND 6TH THE FASTEST TIME HISTORY (50 M FREE, MEN – 21.06 LC) 🌍 WR: Cameron McEvoy @cam_mcevoy — 20.88 (20 Mar) 🏆 RR: Egor Kornev @egorkornevvv , @baydalova_olga — 21.06 (9 June) — 6th fastest result in history Comparing Cameron McEvoy’s world record (20.88) and Egor Kornev’s Russian record (21.06) on the 50 m freestyle. The race contrasts two distinct elite technical models — a short‑stroke, high‑frequency model (McEvoy) and a long‑stroke, highly rhythmic model (Kornev). ❗️Key numbers - Final gap: - Start (0–15 m): Kornev faster by 0.27 s; start velocity higher by 0.20 m/s. - Average distance velocity (15–45 m): McEvoy +0.05 m/s. - Critical zone 25–35 m: McEvoy +0.11 m/s. - Final 5 m: McEvoy +0.11 m/s. - Stroke length: Kornev 1.31 m vs McEvoy 1.05 m (+0.26 m). - Stroke rate: Kornev 74 cycles/min vs McEvoy 97 cycles/min; Kornev’s stroke‑rate deviation ≈ 0.2 cycles/min. - Effective Velocity Coefficient (EVC): McEvoy +31.28 units over Kornev. Phase‑by‑phase analysis 1) Start (0–15 m) Kornev’s start is an outstanding competitive asset: he gains 0.27 s and a clear velocity edge early. In a 50 m sprint the start constitutes a large proportion of the race profile, so this advantage is strategically and practically significant. 2) Clean‑swimming sections (15–45 m) On 15–25 m and 35–45 m the two athletes show almost identical effective speeds (difference ≈ 0.01 m/s), indicating comparable cycle effectiveness in those windows. The defining divergence occurs on 25–35 m: McEvoy is faster by 0.11 m/s. That transitional zone demands maintenance of power and minimization of velocity loss — and here McEvoy converts his mechanics into higher useful speed. 3) Finish (last 5 m) McEvoy again demonstrates superiority (+0.11 m/s). His model sustains or increases pressure on the water under maximal fatigue, producing a stronger terminal velocity and determining the final time advantage. DM us “Egor VS WR” and get the full tactical analysis! ❤️‍🔥 📸 Ph @rus_aquatics , @world_aquatics 📹 Video @matchtv_channel 📈 Analysis @dmitrii_drozhetskii #smartswimcrafttactics #swimanalysis #wr

About