@meghannmcuniff: Attorney Brian Panish questioned Peter Grossman for about two hours on Friday and will continue on Monday. Grossman is a key witness in the punitive damages phase of the trial over the Iskanders' wrongful death lawsuit because punitive damages must correlate to a defendant's income, and Panish told jurors Peter Grossman is helping his wife shield her assets. The jury in Los Angeles on June 2 found Rebecca Grossman and Scott Erickson each liable for $176 million in compensatory damages: $8 million for past damages and $51 million for future damages for Mark Iskander, $6 million and $42 million for future for Jacob Iskander, $10 million to Nancy Iskander for past emotional distress and $25 million for future, and $6 million for past emotional distress and $28 million for future to younger brother Zachary Iskander. Peter Grossman was a defendant in the lawsuit because his wife’s SUV was registered in his name. Erickson, a retired Major League Baseball pitcher, was speeding in a separate vehicle near his girlfriend Rebecca Grossman when Grossman struck the Iskander brothers as they were in a marked crosswalk with their mother and younger brother near Westlake Village on Sept. 29, 2020. Both Erickson and Grossman had been drinking alcohol, and witnesses said they appeared to be racing their Mercedes-Benz AMGs. Grossman, now 62, is serving 15 years to life in prison; prosecutors dismissed a misdemeanor reckless driving charge against Erickson after he recorded a public service announcement about safe driving with Grossman's help. This clip begins with Panish seizing on Peter Grossman's use of the word "accident." "Do you think it's an accident when someone drinking is racing and going 70-80 miles an hour on a 45 mile an hour residential area? You think that's an accident?" Panish asked. Judge Huey Cotton overruled an argumentative objection and Grossman answered, "Mr. Panish, you're making a statement that I don't believe to be completely accurate. I believe that it's a tragic accident. Rebecca was definitely involved, but this fact that you're, you're saying back to me, I accept the fact that that's been stated here. But if you're asking me to recite your verbiage right now, I have difficult time with that." Cotton struck the "comments" as non-responsive. "Can you try to answer my questions, please?" Panish asked. "I will try, sir. I'm not trying to be a evasive, sir," Grossman said. You can watch Grossman's entire testimony on my YouTube channel. He's to return to the witness stand on Monday (June 8) ##law##court##attorney
Meghann Cuniff
Region: US
Sunday 07 June 2026 14:24:14 GMT
Music
Download
Comments
Shannon :
such denial! why does he defend her so fiercely
2026-06-08 10:51:08
3
user7042103938916 :
He IS being evasive. Yes or no would suffice
2026-06-07 17:20:03
54
elizabeth.nolastname :
He's just upset because he's financially impacted.
2026-06-07 18:53:05
29
Krystal Harrison :
He doesn’t want the judgement bc it’s half his money too
2026-06-07 17:50:16
17
saraluvstorawk :
"are you giving me a hypothetical?" prosecutor made a mistake not responding with "why does that matter? are you telling the court that you would answer one way if the question was hypothetical, and a totally different way if identical facts were present in this case?
2026-06-07 14:57:18
18
Jose Cruz :
You would have to define accident
2026-06-07 19:12:48
6
Paul Way :
Not trying to be evasive, sir…😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
2026-06-07 14:38:19
20
brookj503 :
So in many cases if you sign a legal contract while intoxicated it’s not enforceable because you can’t understand what you were doing. So why are people held to a sober understanding in regards to drinking and driving? How can we have these laws both ways….
2026-06-08 07:51:50
2
Buffy.the.Couch.Slayer :
He’s literally making a DOCUMENTARY. He’s TRYING TO MAKE MONEY
2026-06-08 18:23:18
1
middle child syndrome :
all he had to say was I don't know 😭. then he is covered either way. no dispute
2026-06-07 21:01:03
1
ode2ilchj0a :
some of these questions seem to call for legal conclusions and seem to be incomplete and maybe improper hypotheticals.
2026-06-08 09:55:49
2
Kiki8666 :
Who has that kind and money
2026-06-07 23:08:04
0
bitteroldcatlady :
Yes, you are trying to be evasive.
2026-06-08 08:16:35
0
★ヾ(๑╹◡╹)ノ" :
Zero accountability
2026-06-08 10:20:02
0
Bruce Maguire237 :
good man
2026-06-08 04:11:01
0
Lexa_cookies :
W
2026-06-10 20:53:09
0
Shannon :
hypothetical!?!? omg
2026-06-08 10:53:25
0
ChrisCainLaw :
"i don't know" is a fair answer
2026-06-07 14:50:19
5
MrsPotts :
this guy is infuriating
2026-06-07 15:09:15
14
Dementia :
Great lawyering - boxed the witness in, no matter what his answer is, he's screwed
2026-06-07 14:36:20
13
elleryray :
Strange dude
2026-06-07 14:48:39
7
Hannigan LAW :
Surgeons are adeptly skilled at testifying in malpractice cases. He is not answering questions
2026-06-09 21:54:03
1
WonderBrad69 :
She was going 25 over. He was not. 5-10 over. Everyone does that. This is just a money grab.
2026-06-07 14:59:30
0
Jack'sSmirkingRevenge :
at first he didn't include striking the two children in which case the drinking and the racing were not on accident. striking the two kids was on accident as in he did not intentionally aim for the kids. or he could argue the collision was a traffic accident.
2026-06-07 22:52:03
0
merliedoodle :
yea, he for SURE is being evasive with answering these questions because he wants to hold onto his money.
2026-06-08 14:00:33
0
To see more videos from user @meghannmcuniff, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.