@cletustv: Street interview. Ghana vs Panama. on 17th June, 2026. 2026 world Cup tournaments.

Cletus Dapil

Open In TikTok:

Region: GH

Tuesday 09 June 2026 21:25:06 GMT

520045

40104

371

404

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (4.01MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (4.01MB) Watermark .mp4 (10.65MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Kobby Himself :

pls I don't agree with him kraa Ghana will win 3-1

2026-06-12 10:59:27

19

superrocky360🇬🇭🇺🇸 :

Ahhh

2026-06-11 23:13:37

28

Fanthom Fresh :

He is simply telling the fact 😂😂😂🥰

2026-06-12 16:26:32

0

Morris G :

Ghana will use 3 points from panama 🇵🇦 to qualify from the group stage

2026-06-11 13:15:46

65

🆈🅱_🅰🆁🅰🅱🅸🅰🅽 :

Correct Score: Ghana 🇬🇭 2 - 1 Panama 🇵🇦

2026-06-12 09:23:21

11

Mr. Hutchful. :

Ghana will win

2026-06-11 14:40:34

15

Awel Mohammed Tanko :

statistics show that it's going to be a high scoring game since both teams can concede and score ... Bts is very likely

2026-06-11 17:24:18

6

𝒩𝒶𝓇𝓇𝑜 𝐵 :

Eii Kofi how are you doing

2026-06-12 19:11:31

0

#spidder eng :

I know ghana has 7 points

2026-06-10 09:23:33

9

Official Williams Tod :

correct score (1:1)🥰🤑🤩👍, I hope my game boys are here .

2026-06-09 22:34:06

11

Gummies plug :

Who’s this one too?

2026-06-10 13:11:46

6

M… :

God bless you 😂🤣🤣

2026-06-11 02:31:37

7

believe in God :

my boy God bless you 🙏🙏

2026-06-10 22:51:09

1

king [email protected] :

Ghana will win 2 1

2026-06-10 15:51:20

5

Fibinocci :

Yei

2026-06-11 05:01:09

1

Thelma Drobo :

thank you

2026-06-12 16:57:47

1

owusuo3 :

Ghana will win by 2🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

2026-06-12 08:25:10

1

razak zakaria :

send me

2026-06-12 06:45:30

1

Alex Yankson :

Ghana win 2-1

2026-06-12 18:20:21

1

user3483189337864 :

HI

2026-06-12 08:28:12

1

Elijah 🕊️ :

1-1

2026-06-12 08:17:25

1

SkiPSoL :

wow🥰

2026-06-10 15:46:28

1

Harry :

No

2026-06-10 17:21:01

1

sonofbigten :

GH 2 : 1

2026-06-12 08:40:23

1

To see more videos from user @cletustv, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Scotland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿✨ is so much beautiful ❤️ #Scotland #scotlandlife #scotlandbeauty #scotlandtravel #scotlandexplore

Scotland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿✨ is so much beautiful ❤️ #Scotland #scotlandlife #scotlandbeauty #scotlandtravel #scotlandexplore

ركزي وياي✋🏻✨ #nevajewel

ركزي وياي✋🏻✨ #nevajewel

🚀 This Needs to Go Viral! 🚀 Mass production is a must to support the wave! 🌊🔥 Want one? Take a screenshot and DM me on WhatsApp +254723315344 / +254714887623 to place your order. ✅ Follow us for more next-level tech! 💯🔥 🔗 Coolest gadgets you’ll absolutely love! 😍⚡ #TechTrend #NextGenGadgets #Innovation #AI #FutureTech #SmartDevices #Engineering #Robotics #ScienceMagic #TechLover #HighTech #Invention #AIRevolution #GadgetAddict #RobotLife #TechForTheFuture #BostonDynamics #SmartphoneFix #PhoneAccessories #GameChanger #TrendingNow

🚀 This Needs to Go Viral! 🚀 Mass production is a must to support the wave! 🌊🔥 Want one? Take a screenshot and DM me on WhatsApp +254723315344 / +254714887623 to place your order. ✅ Follow us for more next-level tech! 💯🔥 🔗 Coolest gadgets you’ll absolutely love! 😍⚡ #TechTrend #NextGenGadgets #Innovation #AI #FutureTech #SmartDevices #Engineering #Robotics #ScienceMagic #TechLover #HighTech #Invention #AIRevolution #GadgetAddict #RobotLife #TechForTheFuture #BostonDynamics #SmartphoneFix #PhoneAccessories #GameChanger #TrendingNow

$What a lovely day in Paris❤️ || Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a^{b^{c^{\cdot^{\cdot^{\cdot}}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is \bm{g_{64}} where \bm{g_n} { 3 \bm{\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow} 3 if n 1 and 3 \bm{\uparrow^{g_{n-1}}} 3 if n \bm{\geq} 2. \bm{{\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.#paris #2015 #rampage #actor #treanding$
What a lovely day in Paris❤️ || Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a^{b^{c^{\cdot^{\cdot^{\cdot}}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is \bm{g_{64}} where \bm{g_n} { 3 \bm{\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow} 3 if n 1 and 3 \bm{\uparrow^{g_{n-1}}} 3 if n \bm{\geq} 2. \bm{{\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.#paris #2015 #rampage #actor #treanding

ادري بيكم تحجون عليه ....بس الله كريم #تصويري_احترافي_الاجواء👌🏻🕊😴 #fyp

ادري بيكم تحجون عليه ....بس الله كريم #تصويري_احترافي_الاجواء👌🏻🕊😴 #fyp

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy