Deltaven Yoma
Region: ID
Thursday 11 June 2026 10:33:04 GMT
138058
4850
60
94
Music
Download
Comments
rAjA~ :
mau mandi bukan mau nyari ikan
2026-06-12 00:13:33
19
Ririn oktaviani :
orang mana kk
2026-06-11 13:24:20
2
IKHWAN DAULAY :
Ke dua
2026-06-11 10:51:52
1
fredireckkavin :
ada sambung lagi?
2026-06-13 12:57:24
0
Listman Wee :
cowokku hensem
2026-07-05 01:45:26
0
GOBARRR :
pertama😁
2026-06-11 10:50:29
1
Sahron Maulana :
ke 4
2026-06-11 10:54:06
0
𝓑𝓲𝓵𝓾𝓷𝓰𝓽𝓾𝓷𝓰🙈 :
dimna ni?
2026-06-19 04:30:25
0
titiktitikkoma :
sepertinya enak banget mandi disana
2026-06-11 11:04:14
1
Deky :
Mantapp
2026-06-19 21:22:22
0
linaa 〽️ :
best nya...😊
2026-06-17 02:04:42
0
daffff :
casting pake umpan ikan palsu pasti gacor bang
2026-06-11 11:04:46
5
syaaaa_aja :
itu ikan apa
2026-06-28 06:09:17
0
EXL' TAGUK :
coba nembak mlm bro klo malam lebih seru
2026-06-17 02:50:35
0
PARI | MGS PKS :
lempar jalanya bagus banget 🤩
2026-06-15 20:43:14
0
Nollaboots :
Mantap
2026-06-11 13:24:50
0
man :
pengen ikut cok kaya nya seru
2026-06-11 13:46:29
1
Jovan sepek gg :
first
2026-06-11 10:56:10
0
APPATENG26 :
lanjut bg
2026-06-12 07:20:30
0
LWFC CLUB :
Sungai masih banyak ikn
2026-06-13 06:22:30
0
Hamzx x p :
komen ah
2026-07-01 05:31:54
0
Timo_Johang :
Macam ikan kelabau banyak duri tu
2026-06-13 19:42:11
0
emmy :
masih terjaga kawasan sana
2026-06-13 09:27:44
0
sen :
info lokasi nya di mana broo
2026-06-15 01:59:14
0
Arjun'ee :
kenapa disana gk ada ikan tawes? padahal sungainya cocok untuk ikan tawes, coba tebar bibitnya bang
2026-06-18 13:08:08
0
To see more videos from user @deltaven.yoma, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![roblox sports go hard #roblox #funnymemes #streamer #games #gaming Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.](/video/cover/7667170654176677142.webp)
