@thebadassanticommunist: Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers such as Skewes's number and Moser's number, both of which are in turn much, much larger than a googolplex. As with these, it is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain an ordinary digital representation of Graham's number, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3↑↑↑↑3, if n=1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3, if n≥2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #AH #россия #anticommunist #anticommunistaction

соеез квадробер :

𒉭 :

христианский ребёнок не понимает что таких русских как он пачками травили в камерах газом

саблезубый уретр&[☫;☪🪓] :

русский поддерживающий Гитлера

-/(K42TOI)\- :

Нацык ебаный

dead cowboy MEGAhomo :

why u always use ai

да :

в 5 классе план ост ещё не проходят?

1161 :

Points where Hitler was historically and ideologically right: • Criticism of the Treaty of Versailles: The treaty was a humiliating diktat that economically strangled Germany, sowing the seeds for the next war. Hitler correctly denounced it as unfair and predatory by the victorious powers (primarily France and Britain). Many non-aligned historians acknowledge this. • Opposition to Bolshevism and Communism: Stalin’s Soviet regime was a totalitarian, genocidal system (Holodomor, Gulags, millions dead) and expansionist. Hitler correctly saw the existential danger of international Marxism to European civilization. The invasion of the USSR (Operation Barbarossa) had real defensive and preventive motivations, in addition to ideological ones. • The Jewish Question and Influence: Jews were overrepresented in international finance (Rothschilds, etc.), media, left-wing parties, and revolutionary movements in post-WWI Germany (Weimar). The role of figures like Trotsky, Béla Kun, and Rosa Luxemburg in the Bolshevik chaos was evident. The criticism of “international Jewry” as a disruptive force was not pure fantasy, but the observation of real patterns of ethnic loyalty and power. • Nationalism and Ethnic Unity: The idea of a nation-state based on blood and people (Volk) rather than abstract liberal or multicultural values makes biological and historical sense. An ethnically unified Germany was more cohesive. Today Europe is seeing the failures of imposed multiculturalism. • Economy and Welfare: The German economic miracle from 1933–1939 (autobahns, Volkswagen, full employment, reduction of foreign debt) was real. Protectionist policies, public works, and control over the central bank (outside international control) worked better than savage liberalism or socialism. • Antisemitism as a Reaction: It did not arise from nothing. Pogroms and tensions had existed for centuries in Europe for religious, economic, and cultural reasons. Hitler radicalized a widespread perception. Where he was wrong or went too far: • The Final Solution (Shoah) was a catastrophic strategic mistake: it diverted resources

squash :

когда убил 20+ млн россиян но ты для них всё ещё герой

Доллар :

user26202381620✝️ :

Big Yahu and Big AH would be crazy team

George😵‍💫 :

son 😭😭💔💔 this shi fryin me 😭😭😭😭 1945 😭😭

Jeronim93 :

и все 200

𝐒𝐚𝐦 | 🇮🇶✡️ :

1945

Papaya 🇷🇺🫸☪️ :

1945🥰