1. Home
  2. Detail

@majid_olshoop: #yg mau tanya2 boleh ya dm aj.

😘salmah puncak😘
😘salmah puncak😘
Open In TikTok:
Region: ID
Friday 12 June 2026 06:34:36 GMT
10488
141
6
1

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.83MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (1.83MB) Watermark .mp4 (3.81MB) Music .mp3

Comments

mamh.ega6
mamh ega :
cisaruana Cisarua mana
2026-06-14 06:43:20
0
mamaherlan18
mama herlan :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-06-13 08:40:29
1
ros.rosni43
nia :
👍👍👍
2026-07-10 14:56:29
0
To see more videos from user @majid_olshoop, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

#ضباء_تبوك_السعوديه #الرياض_الان #اكسبلورexplore #الشعب_الصيني_ماله_حل
#ضباء_تبوك_السعوديه #الرياض_الان #اكسبلورexplore #الشعب_الصيني_ماله_حل
Slemani 💛 #slemani #goizha #azmarmountain #ypfッ #pageforyou #pov #شعب_الصيني_ماله_حل😂😂 #viral #life #ypシ #nightview #Love #viralvideo
Slemani 💛 #slemani #goizha #azmarmountain #ypfッ #pageforyou #pov #شعب_الصيني_ماله_حل😂😂 #viral #life #ypシ #nightview #Love #viralvideo
#pashtofullsong🎧🎤🎶🎵
#pashtofullsong🎧🎤🎶🎵
The controversy surrounding the paternity of children linked to the late Kadongo Kamu legend Paul Kafeero has simmered for over two decades, involving inheritance, estate disputes, and dozens of claimants. Minister Balaam Barugahara Ateenyi, a close associate of the late musician, took a decisive step earlier in 2026 by facilitating the exhumation of Kafeero’s remains for DNA sampling, following a court order. This process aimed to resolve long-standing family conflicts, with over 25 young people claiming biological ties. Results were released on June 25, 2026, confirming only four as biological children: Thomas (Schwarzenegger) Kafeero, Simon Peter Kafeero, Benedicto Kafeero, and Elizabeth Nagawa. The announcement, handled through multiple accredited labs including Police Forensic, Government Analytical, and MBN Laboratory, was intended to bring finality but instead ignited widespread skepticism due to striking resemblances of excluded claimants to the late singer. Public and elite doubt peaked immediately after the results, fueled by viral side-by-side photos highlighting uncanny physical similarities between the late Kafeero and some of the non-matching children. On June 25, Deputy Speaker of Parliament Thomas Tayebwa publicly questioned the findings on X, tagging Balaam. While affirming trust in science, Tayebwa expressed disbelief, particularly over a prominent lookalike claimant (often referred to as Paulo), stating that such outcomes might necessitate DNA tests on living parents for verification. He accompanied his post with comparative images, amplifying national conversation and reflecting broader societal unease about the process, accuracy, or potential influences behind the results. Tayebwa’s intervention escalated the discourse from mere public reaction to a high-level call for further action. On June 26, responding to Balaam’s defense of the multi-lab verification and a reference to one of Kafeero’s songs, Tayebwa directly proposed conducting DNA tests on the rest of Kafeero’s brothers. His reasoning centered on achieving “total closure,” arguing that the undeniable resemblances of certain children could not be dismissed. He posed the pointed question “Who fathered them?” and expressed confidence in Balaam’s ability to manage the complex matter, effectively challenging the finality of the initial tests by suggesting familial lineage on the paternal side needed deeper scrutiny. The suggestion has stirred intense debate on beyond, with mixed reactions ranging from support for thoroughness to accusations of undermining credible science. Proponents argue it could clarify whether some children share DNA with Kafeero’s siblings (potentially indicating uncle-nephew relations or other family dynamics), providing answers for those who resemble the legend strongly. Critics, however, caution against endless testing, defend the integrity of the three independent labs, and warn that it risks reopening healed wounds or shifting focus from maternal accountability. Some users have even referenced prior family tests or cultural contexts, while calls for independent foreign labs (e.g., in South Africa or Kenya) have grown louder for undisputed credibility. As it stands, the matter remains fluid and unresolved, with Tayebwa’s proposal injecting fresh momentum into a saga that was supposed to conclude with the June 25 announcement. Balaam has engaged directly but emphasized the robustness of existing results. The exchange highlights deeper Ugandan societal issues around paternity, inheritance, trust in institutions, and the power of visual resemblance versus scientific evidence. Whether further DNA involving Kafeero’s brothers proceeds will likely depend on family consensus, court directives, or Balaam’s facilitation, but for now, it keeps the late musician’s legacy and family drama firmly in the public eye.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ SOURCE: Pulse Ug, Thomas Taybwa, Minister Balaam.
The controversy surrounding the paternity of children linked to the late Kadongo Kamu legend Paul Kafeero has simmered for over two decades, involving inheritance, estate disputes, and dozens of claimants. Minister Balaam Barugahara Ateenyi, a close associate of the late musician, took a decisive step earlier in 2026 by facilitating the exhumation of Kafeero’s remains for DNA sampling, following a court order. This process aimed to resolve long-standing family conflicts, with over 25 young people claiming biological ties. Results were released on June 25, 2026, confirming only four as biological children: Thomas (Schwarzenegger) Kafeero, Simon Peter Kafeero, Benedicto Kafeero, and Elizabeth Nagawa. The announcement, handled through multiple accredited labs including Police Forensic, Government Analytical, and MBN Laboratory, was intended to bring finality but instead ignited widespread skepticism due to striking resemblances of excluded claimants to the late singer. Public and elite doubt peaked immediately after the results, fueled by viral side-by-side photos highlighting uncanny physical similarities between the late Kafeero and some of the non-matching children. On June 25, Deputy Speaker of Parliament Thomas Tayebwa publicly questioned the findings on X, tagging Balaam. While affirming trust in science, Tayebwa expressed disbelief, particularly over a prominent lookalike claimant (often referred to as Paulo), stating that such outcomes might necessitate DNA tests on living parents for verification. He accompanied his post with comparative images, amplifying national conversation and reflecting broader societal unease about the process, accuracy, or potential influences behind the results. Tayebwa’s intervention escalated the discourse from mere public reaction to a high-level call for further action. On June 26, responding to Balaam’s defense of the multi-lab verification and a reference to one of Kafeero’s songs, Tayebwa directly proposed conducting DNA tests on the rest of Kafeero’s brothers. His reasoning centered on achieving “total closure,” arguing that the undeniable resemblances of certain children could not be dismissed. He posed the pointed question “Who fathered them?” and expressed confidence in Balaam’s ability to manage the complex matter, effectively challenging the finality of the initial tests by suggesting familial lineage on the paternal side needed deeper scrutiny. The suggestion has stirred intense debate on beyond, with mixed reactions ranging from support for thoroughness to accusations of undermining credible science. Proponents argue it could clarify whether some children share DNA with Kafeero’s siblings (potentially indicating uncle-nephew relations or other family dynamics), providing answers for those who resemble the legend strongly. Critics, however, caution against endless testing, defend the integrity of the three independent labs, and warn that it risks reopening healed wounds or shifting focus from maternal accountability. Some users have even referenced prior family tests or cultural contexts, while calls for independent foreign labs (e.g., in South Africa or Kenya) have grown louder for undisputed credibility. As it stands, the matter remains fluid and unresolved, with Tayebwa’s proposal injecting fresh momentum into a saga that was supposed to conclude with the June 25 announcement. Balaam has engaged directly but emphasized the robustness of existing results. The exchange highlights deeper Ugandan societal issues around paternity, inheritance, trust in institutions, and the power of visual resemblance versus scientific evidence. Whether further DNA involving Kafeero’s brothers proceeds will likely depend on family consensus, court directives, or Balaam’s facilitation, but for now, it keeps the late musician’s legacy and family drama firmly in the public eye.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ SOURCE: Pulse Ug, Thomas Taybwa, Minister Balaam.
بۆ دووەمین ساڵ پاریسان جێرمان بووە پاڵەوانی چامپیۆنسلیگ🔥!/فاز باريس سان جيرمان بدوري أبطال أوروبا للعام الثاني على التوالي 🔥!#aro_ftbl #viral #psg #arsenal #championsleague @TikTok
بۆ دووەمین ساڵ پاریسان جێرمان بووە پاڵەوانی چامپیۆنسلیگ🔥!/فاز باريس سان جيرمان بدوري أبطال أوروبا للعام الثاني على التوالي 🔥!#aro_ftbl #viral #psg #arsenal #championsleague @TikTok
AMO curtir um All Inclusive Premium nesse paraíso que é Japaratinga 💚 #japaratingaresort #japaratinga #viagemtiktok #traveltiktok #ferias
AMO curtir um All Inclusive Premium nesse paraíso que é Japaratinga 💚 #japaratingaresort #japaratinga #viagemtiktok #traveltiktok #ferias

About

Legal