@stephenpetro411: There's a reasoning technique over two thousand years old that almost nobody is taught — and it's more powerful than most arguments you know how to make. It's called reductio ad absurdum. When you can't prove something directly, you assume the *opposite* is true and follow it wherever it leads. If it leads somewhere impossible, you've proven your case. Euclid used it to prove there are infinitely many primes. Assume there's a finite list. Multiply them all, add one. That new number breaks the list either way — contradiction. The same move sits at the heart of legal argument, scientific falsification, and strategy. So next time you believe something but can't prove it directly: Write the opposite claim at the top of a page. Follow it as far as it goes. You'll either hit a contradiction — that's your proof — or realize your belief was shakier than you thought. Both outcomes are worth having. #Logic #CriticalThinking #Reasoning #Philosophy
Agreed. Reductio ad absurdum is not just a philosophical trick. It is used across mathematics, philosophy, and physics. In physics, though, we often describe the relevant structure as modus tollens: If theory T implies consequence C, and C is false, inconsistent, or experimentally excluded, then T cannot stand as stated. Reductio is the broader argumentative form, but modus tollens is often the logical skeleton
2026-06-13 22:42:46
2
the man of the hour :
wow what an obscure an unknown concept
2026-06-13 19:41:04
3
farnas :
In Islamic logic, this is called "proof by contradiction" (qiyas alkhalf).
2026-06-13 18:05:34
5
CJeditzz 🔴🐐 :
can we use this to prove or disprove god??
2026-06-13 15:19:01
0
To see more videos from user @stephenpetro411, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.