@vlogmimi2026: Dừa sáp dẻo béo bùi, size 2-3 người ăn. Đặc sản Cầu Kè - Trà Vinh, bao ăn nha #duasap #duasaptravinh #dacsanmientay #dacsanvungmien #food

Mimi Vlog
Mimi Vlog
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Monday 15 June 2026 17:18:00 GMT
41215
208
25
69

Music

Download

Comments

t___p96
☕🍂───୨ৎ───☨ίên☨ίên🌼 :
bữa tui mua 69k mà không giống trên vd vậy sh
2026-06-18 15:52:49
2
khanhle7035
khanhle7035 :
xuống mấy trạm dừng chân miền tây toàn coi 150-200k sao trên này rẻ vậy nhỉ 😂
2026-06-16 06:11:15
1
nhi.m.bm.2.con
Nhi Mẹ Bỉm 2 Con :
dua ngon lắm giá siêu hời nữa
2026-06-17 14:04:13
1
soidem83
longco Shop :
nước y như dừa nhà luôn
2026-07-29 10:28:29
0
mykim.2019
Tạp hóa Mỹ Kim :
Ngon dữ dằn
2026-06-19 13:20:08
0
nuocngamsauranghoimieng
Trị Hôi Miệng_Thơm Người_DạDày :
Gui cho e chưa
2026-06-19 11:15:50
0
pholihuynh1922
HUYNH PHO LI :
nhìn ngon wá di
2026-08-09 13:54:05
0
user184911780
TAWANCHAI :
nói thật lòng ngon là do mình cho sữa với đậu phộng vào thôi. k cho vào thì mình ăn dc thìa duy nhất rồi bỏ chớ loại này so với dừa thường thì như kiểu cơm thiu với cơm sốt vậy đó.
2026-07-09 11:49:19
0
trucly_sandeal
Bảo bối :
Loại này ăn đc mấy nguoi c
2026-06-18 04:24:57
0
To see more videos from user @vlogmimi2026, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Why “asking ten people” can kill an idea •	Dilution of vision: When you solicit broad opinions before you’ve clarified your core hypothesis, you get ten different directions and end up with a compromised, generic version. •	Premature optimization: Early feedback often focuses on surface details (wording, colors, edge cases) instead of whether the underlying problem and solution are worth pursuing. •	Social risk aversion: People tend to point out risks more than possibilities, especially if they’re not invested in your success. That skews the signal toward “why this won’t work.” •	Decision paralysis: Conflicting advice creates uncertainty, which leads to endless tweaking instead of shipping a testable version. When asking people helps instead of hurts The problem isn’t feedback; it’s unstructured, premature, and unfocused feedback. •	Ask the right people: Talk to people who actually experience the problem you’re solving, not just colleagues or friends who want to be helpful. •	Ask at the right time: •	Very early: test the problem and value proposition (“Does this matter to you?”). •	Mid-stage: test usability and clarity (“Can you do X without help?”). •	Later: test pricing, positioning, and scale. •	Ask the right questions: •	“What’s the last time you faced this problem?” •	“How do you solve it now?” •	“What would make this 10x better?”   Avoid “Do you like this idea?” which invites polite, low-signal answers. A better pattern than “ask ten people” Instead of “ask ten people what they think,” try: 1.	Write a one-paragraph hypothesis: •	Who has the problem? •	What is the problem? •	What is your proposed solution? •	What would count as success? 2.	Talk to 3–5 target users with that hypothesis in mind, focusing on their behavior and pain, not your solution’s features. 3.	Look for patterns, not opinions: If multiple people independently describe the same pain and current workaround, that’s a strong signal. 4.	Decide, then test: Make a clear decision based on patterns, then run a small experiment (landing page, prototype, pilot) instead of re-opening the debate.
Why “asking ten people” can kill an idea • Dilution of vision: When you solicit broad opinions before you’ve clarified your core hypothesis, you get ten different directions and end up with a compromised, generic version. • Premature optimization: Early feedback often focuses on surface details (wording, colors, edge cases) instead of whether the underlying problem and solution are worth pursuing. • Social risk aversion: People tend to point out risks more than possibilities, especially if they’re not invested in your success. That skews the signal toward “why this won’t work.” • Decision paralysis: Conflicting advice creates uncertainty, which leads to endless tweaking instead of shipping a testable version. When asking people helps instead of hurts The problem isn’t feedback; it’s unstructured, premature, and unfocused feedback. • Ask the right people: Talk to people who actually experience the problem you’re solving, not just colleagues or friends who want to be helpful. • Ask at the right time: • Very early: test the problem and value proposition (“Does this matter to you?”). • Mid-stage: test usability and clarity (“Can you do X without help?”). • Later: test pricing, positioning, and scale. • Ask the right questions: • “What’s the last time you faced this problem?” • “How do you solve it now?” • “What would make this 10x better?” Avoid “Do you like this idea?” which invites polite, low-signal answers. A better pattern than “ask ten people” Instead of “ask ten people what they think,” try: 1. Write a one-paragraph hypothesis: • Who has the problem? • What is the problem? • What is your proposed solution? • What would count as success? 2. Talk to 3–5 target users with that hypothesis in mind, focusing on their behavior and pain, not your solution’s features. 3. Look for patterns, not opinions: If multiple people independently describe the same pain and current workaround, that’s a strong signal. 4. Decide, then test: Make a clear decision based on patterns, then run a small experiment (landing page, prototype, pilot) instead of re-opening the debate.

About