@miry.vidareal: Respuesta a @Yans&Amanda está súper lindo y mi bebé le encanta. Al ver la ballena le gusta tomar agua con el. Así que si tu bebé está empezando a tomar agua y se le hace difícil con otros pomos, prueba con este le va a encantar. Te dejo el link encima de mi nombre. #mamaprimeriza #waterbottleforbaby #waterbottles #babymusthaves #mom

miry.vidareal

Open In TikTok:

Region: US

Monday 15 June 2026 16:09:10 GMT

389

12

4

2

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (3.51MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (3.04MB) Watermark .mp4 (3.22MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Ara-lugones87🇨🇺🍒 :

Es divino amiga y ellos se motivan🥰🥰🥰

2026-06-15 16:12:09

1

Roxana Cortes :

👏👏👏

2026-06-15 17:23:13

1

To see more videos from user @miry.vidareal, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

#ShahloSalayeva @Shahlo Salayeva @NAVOMUSIC.UZ ❤️👸🏻👑

#ShahloSalayeva @Shahlo Salayeva @NAVOMUSIC.UZ ❤️👸🏻👑

#lifanccr150🖤 #fyp #fupシ #факти #літо

#lifanccr150🖤 #fyp #fupシ #факти #літо

Race is not the root. Gender is not the root. Religion is not the root. Class is not the root. Those are the containers. The costumes. The operating channels. The root is the organizing logic underneath them: dominance and supremacy. So when people say: “It’s slavery.” That is too contained. Slavery is an expression of dominance and supremacy. When people say: “It’s white supremacy.” That is still too contained. White supremacy is the racialized expression of dominance and supremacy. When people say: “It’s patriarchy.” That is still too contained. Patriarchy is the gendered expression of dominance and supremacy. When people say: “It’s classism.” That is the economic expression of dominance and supremacy. When people say: “It’s religious control.” That is the theological expression of dominance and supremacy. The assignment changes. The construct stays. That is why the conversation keeps looping. Because people keep arguing over the category: Race. Gender. Religion. Class. Politics. Black men. Black women. White people. Parents. Children. But the category is the con. The category keeps people inside the exchange. The category keeps people fighting over which expression caused the harm while the underlying architecture keeps operating. That is why “white supremacy” alone cannot hold the full explanation. White supremacy explains a specific racial arrangement of dominance. It does not explain dominance itself. And when you remove the racial label, the structure is still sitting there. Hierarchy. Ownership. Control. Extraction. Obedience. Ranking. Purity. Authority. Exclusion. Dehumanization. That existed before modern race. That existed before the transatlantic slave trade. That existed before America. That existed through empire, conquest, caste, class, patriarchy, religion, bloodline, nation, and tribe. So the real move is: Male-dominant white-supremacist environment. Drop male. Drop white. Drop gender. Drop race. What remains? Dominance and supremacy. That is the construct. People are struggling to get there Because “white supremacy” gives people a visible target. “Racism” gives people a visible target. “Patriarchy” gives people a visible target. “Slavery” gives people a historical target. Yet “dominance and supremacy” removes the comfort of one target. Now the question becomes: Where am I reproducing the same logic? Where am I organizing through rank? Where am I seeking superiority? Where am I protecting position? Where am I using hierarchy to prove value? Where am I imitating the very structure I claim to oppose? That is why the conversation gets uncomfortable. Because when you name the construct, nobody gets to hide behind the category. Black men cannot hide behind “white supremacy” while reproducing male dominance. Black women cannot hide behind “patriarchy” while reproducing superiority logic, avoidance, sloppy language, or unexamined behavior. Religious people cannot hide behind righteousness while reproducing obedience structures. Conscious people cannot hide behind knowledge while reproducing hierarchy. Political people cannot hide behind justice while reproducing imbalance. Parents cannot hide behind sacrifice while refusing to examine the environment they helped create. Everybody gets pulled into examination. That is why the construct is harder to talk about. It implicates the pattern, not just the villain. And that is also why the race, gender, religion conversations become cons in themselves. Not because race is fake. Not because gender has no consequences. Not because religion has no power. Not because class does not matter. They matter materially. They shape lives. They produce real consequences. But they also function as mirrors inside the construct. People get trapped reacting to the mirror. Race mirror. Gender mirror. Religion mirror. Class mirror. Political mirror. Meanwhile the architecture remains. That is the shift. The point is not: “Stop talking about race.” The point is: Do not let race become the ceiling of analysis. The point is not: “Stop talking about gender.” The point is: Do not let gender hide the deeper dominan

Race is not the root. Gender is not the root. Religion is not the root. Class is not the root. Those are the containers. The costumes. The operating channels. The root is the organizing logic underneath them: dominance and supremacy. So when people say: “It’s slavery.” That is too contained. Slavery is an expression of dominance and supremacy. When people say: “It’s white supremacy.” That is still too contained. White supremacy is the racialized expression of dominance and supremacy. When people say: “It’s patriarchy.” That is still too contained. Patriarchy is the gendered expression of dominance and supremacy. When people say: “It’s classism.” That is the economic expression of dominance and supremacy. When people say: “It’s religious control.” That is the theological expression of dominance and supremacy. The assignment changes. The construct stays. That is why the conversation keeps looping. Because people keep arguing over the category: Race. Gender. Religion. Class. Politics. Black men. Black women. White people. Parents. Children. But the category is the con. The category keeps people inside the exchange. The category keeps people fighting over which expression caused the harm while the underlying architecture keeps operating. That is why “white supremacy” alone cannot hold the full explanation. White supremacy explains a specific racial arrangement of dominance. It does not explain dominance itself. And when you remove the racial label, the structure is still sitting there. Hierarchy. Ownership. Control. Extraction. Obedience. Ranking. Purity. Authority. Exclusion. Dehumanization. That existed before modern race. That existed before the transatlantic slave trade. That existed before America. That existed through empire, conquest, caste, class, patriarchy, religion, bloodline, nation, and tribe. So the real move is: Male-dominant white-supremacist environment. Drop male. Drop white. Drop gender. Drop race. What remains? Dominance and supremacy. That is the construct. People are struggling to get there Because “white supremacy” gives people a visible target. “Racism” gives people a visible target. “Patriarchy” gives people a visible target. “Slavery” gives people a historical target. Yet “dominance and supremacy” removes the comfort of one target. Now the question becomes: Where am I reproducing the same logic? Where am I organizing through rank? Where am I seeking superiority? Where am I protecting position? Where am I using hierarchy to prove value? Where am I imitating the very structure I claim to oppose? That is why the conversation gets uncomfortable. Because when you name the construct, nobody gets to hide behind the category. Black men cannot hide behind “white supremacy” while reproducing male dominance. Black women cannot hide behind “patriarchy” while reproducing superiority logic, avoidance, sloppy language, or unexamined behavior. Religious people cannot hide behind righteousness while reproducing obedience structures. Conscious people cannot hide behind knowledge while reproducing hierarchy. Political people cannot hide behind justice while reproducing imbalance. Parents cannot hide behind sacrifice while refusing to examine the environment they helped create. Everybody gets pulled into examination. That is why the construct is harder to talk about. It implicates the pattern, not just the villain. And that is also why the race, gender, religion conversations become cons in themselves. Not because race is fake. Not because gender has no consequences. Not because religion has no power. Not because class does not matter. They matter materially. They shape lives. They produce real consequences. But they also function as mirrors inside the construct. People get trapped reacting to the mirror. Race mirror. Gender mirror. Religion mirror. Class mirror. Political mirror. Meanwhile the architecture remains. That is the shift. The point is not: “Stop talking about race.” The point is: Do not let race become the ceiling of analysis. The point is not: “Stop talking about gender.” The point is: Do not let gender hide the deeper dominan

منصوره ياشيعه على منصوره.. 😏🇮🇷🇮🇶✌️.... . . . . . #المصمم_مانشستراوي #تصميم_فيديوهات🎶🎤🎬تصميمي🔥 #تصميمي #ايران_والعراق_لايمكن_الفراق

منصوره ياشيعه على منصوره.. 😏🇮🇷🇮🇶✌️.... . . . . . #المصمم_مانشستراوي #تصميم_فيديوهات🎶🎤🎬تصميمي🔥 #تصميمي #ايران_والعراق_لايمكن_الفراق

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy