@petbookmx: 💔 Nuestra generación le ha fallado a quienes solo nos brindan amor y lealtad. No permitamos que las próximas generaciones repitan nuestros errores. #adopta #cambiemossumundo

Petbook
Petbook
Open In TikTok:
Region: MX
Monday 15 June 2026 17:15:25 GMT
74781
11192
32
3844

Music

Download

Comments

srita.wonka
srita.wonka :
a nosotros mi mamá desde niños nos inculco la educación y el respeto animal a todas las especies y a todos los seres vivos (desde una maceta, un árbol nos decía que si les jalaba o arrancabas sus hojitas a ellos les dolía como a nosotros un jalón de orejas) además a mí y a mis hermanos nos puso corazón de perrito combinado con corazón de pollo por eso es mi sueño encontrar a alguien que quiera como yo a los perritos que no me juzgue porque ayudo o comparto un pedacito de comida con los que no tienen, que no critique si acaricio un perrito de la calle, quería ser veterinaria Pero mi corazón se me rompe en fin.....
2026-06-15 23:00:13
52
soul_1704
Luna :
No es hasta que crezcan, es desde pequeños, soy una mamá orgullosa de ver a mis peques cuidar con el alma a los animalitos desprotegidos, alimentarlos y entregarse en alma a su cuido 🥰
2026-06-16 00:30:32
19
girasol16550
girasol16🌻 :
Orgullosa de estar sembrado en mis hijos amor hacia los perritos, son unos más de nuestra familia ❤️
2026-07-07 23:59:36
6
stefy_h5
Stefany☀️☀️ :
A mi hija le crié con peluditos a su lado y qué bonito es ver como son de buenos maestros aunque no hablen le enseñaron a mi hija a ser una buena niña no hay nada mejor que su compañía 🙏❤️
2026-07-10 15:30:42
0
leidylortega
Leo 🦁🐾🐱🐶🤘🏻🎸🔥🇻🇪 :
2026-06-16 00:49:20
1
libralopez9210
✨Suy✨💋 :
son solo niños en otros cuerpos 🥰
2026-06-15 17:33:50
7
ladyeli_12
Ꮛlitα :
si por favor... depende de nosotros crear una nueva generación que tengan respeto hacia esos seres inocentes..🐶🐶🐶🐈🐈🐈
2026-07-29 19:46:36
0
ifreneque
Iriz :
en toda mi infancia tuvimos perros y son tan bonitos con mucha responsabilidad que ahora ya solo un rato los acaricio pero ya no m gusta tenerlos porq veo q jente los tiene y nos los cuida es como cada persona los trate y los qiera..
2026-06-18 20:39:18
0
belove1131
Belove :
Correcto! 🤗 Eduquemos a nuestros hijos para que en un futuro haya un ejercito de personas defensoras de sus derechos 🤗🥰
2026-06-16 00:01:59
1
elianadu5
Eliana :
Mí hija ama a los perritos. ..algo de mí quedará en ella
2026-07-01 19:28:28
0
heidymaibethcanni
Maibeth :
no mis hijos a nuestro enano le dicen hijo 🥰
2026-07-20 23:07:56
0
mariam071217
Mar :
Yo adoro a mis perros
2026-06-26 23:01:21
0
dorotea.prados
Dorotea Prados :
son lo mas bello y sincero que existe en la tierra 🌎 💕🐶🥰
2026-06-16 05:16:23
1
javiera_ar_2014
Javi :
Una mamá q le enseñó desde pequeño y lo sigue asiendo a respetar a todos los animales incluso los árboles que están a nuestro alrededor. . . 🥰
2026-07-09 21:51:02
0
adrianaq.fernande
Adrianaq Fernandez 🇨🇷🇨🇷 :
eso sería!!!!🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
2026-06-16 01:04:16
0
marawisa15
MW'🦁 :
💖
2026-06-15 17:25:33
0
ivonne.montoya5
Ivonne Montoya :
Copia y Pega, Enviemos mensajes más largos para ayudar Señor, te pedimos que protejas a todos los animalitos del mundo, desde los más pequeños hasta los más grandes. Que tu amor y misericordia los alcancen y que la humanidad aprenda a vivir en armonía con ellos. Amén. Señor, mira con bondad a los animalitos que sufren hambre, dolor o abandono. Dales fuerza, consuelo y protección. Que encuentren refugio y cuidado, y que la humanidad aprenda a tratarlos con justicia, amor y respeto. Señor, bendice a nuestras mascotas y a todos los animalitos que viven con nosotros. Que sus vidas estén llenas de salud, alegría y amor. Guíanos para ser buenos cuidadores y que podamos brindarles todo lo que necesitan. Amén.AlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimentoAlimento
2026-06-16 01:58:38
0
zena22246
zena :
no se metan con los niños, si alguien hace daño a los animales son los adultos, y si lo dice x el caso de Sasha, fue un accidente, en el que el niño también salió perjudicado.
2026-06-15 23:50:08
0
irbin15
sergio15 :
😭😭😭
2026-07-18 10:14:22
0
isaiasceronhotmai5
Iza Valdivia :
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
2026-06-24 20:52:24
0
andreaarmida
andreaesco :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-06-22 20:37:56
0
solk99
Karen Sol :
🙏🙏🙏
2026-06-26 19:26:19
0
lizeth.hidalgo6
Lizeth Hidalgo🌻 :
🥰
2026-06-15 23:01:35
0
To see more videos from user @petbookmx, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

roblox sports go hard #roblox #funnymemes #streamer #games #gaming  Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form  a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is  g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if  n = 1  and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if  n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.
roblox sports go hard #roblox #funnymemes #streamer #games #gaming Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.

About