MORG 💋🪩📚🍸💄🍒 :
I’m an 11th grade ELA teacher at a school serving an overwhelming majority of black and brown kids in a state where SAT is THE state exam. I say all of this to say that I am intimately familiar both with the exam and teaching the population you’re discussing here. With that said, I disagree with your argument here. Firstly, the “data” on the exam you’re presenting here is 5-24 years old; the test has gone through two MAJOR overhauls since the item analysis you cite and one major overhauling than the other two. In 2024, the test was re-vamped dramatically: the exam was shortened significantly, the math sections now allow calculators throughout the entirety of the exam, and most importantly, the exam is now adaptive meaning that students who demonstrate lower proficiency in module 1 are given a more appropriate module 2, such that they can be assessed more fairly and accurately. Additionally, CB’s exclusive, official partner is Khan Academy, which was made free on purpose to be more equitable. Is the exam perfect? Absolutely not. However, the ed data we have shows a very strong correlation between being successful on the exam and being successful in higher education. With grade inflation and transcript padding, two 4.0 students with several AP courses and extracurriculars under their belt can and do have dramatically different levels of proficiency. Test optional applications have placed many ill prepared students in institutions that are dually unprepared to support their learning. I agree with your points that the exam, like all aspects of American education, is inequitable. However, it feels extremely disingenuous to make a video about how proponents of re-introduction of the exam are misrepresenting data when you’re predicating your argument on scholarship which is no longer relevant, by a matter of multiple decades, to the exam in question.
2026-06-16 20:35:17