Akela🪲🕸️
Region: US
Tuesday 16 June 2026 19:49:34 GMT
23852
6337
27
247
Music
Download
Comments
🏳️⚧️IridetheProtogen🏳️⚧️🚥 :
wikipedia also states itself that it is a tertiary source and is meant to be a jumping off point, tbh wikipedia is so freaking cool
2026-06-17 05:23:18
283
Quack Lord77 :
could I please some sources to read about things like socialism capitalism and communism as well as stuff about the Israel and Palestine thing it’s very tricky to find sources
2026-06-17 06:24:36
39
A̶D̶A̶M̶ :
But aren't primary sources often bad? Because they tend to be incomplete and usually come with bias/emotional baggage
2026-06-17 13:53:16
0
Heart ♡ 🐁🌕 | 📼🪱 :
I thought it was pronounced tershery
2026-06-17 01:27:47
40
Alilunstable 🦘 :
"it happens to everyone" <- this is VERY important! Internalise this. Repeat this to yourself over and over! Understanding this makes it easier to notice when you oopsied, but also means you're less inclined to be a butt when someone else messes up too!
2026-06-17 11:05:45
9
⛤ ༒︎🦇💛🤍𝐅𝐚𝐲𝐞💜🖤🦇༒︎ ⛤ :
NOOO NOT EMILY THE SOURCE!!! But yea this is a nice refresher for some people knowing people need to hear this again. It’s better to make sure to remember this than to just stay ignorant. Checking sources is and always will be important! I feel too many times people skip this step.
2026-06-16 20:19:02
79
Luis 🦖 :
I love how interesting and various topics are your videos
2026-06-16 19:59:55
53
VOek1n4 :
I am present and I am here to learn
2026-06-17 04:47:22
2
nana :
I love history as a subject in highschool because this is the only place this info is usually taught.
2026-06-17 04:59:42
3
martinwhiteford01 :
Preach sister!
2026-06-17 04:21:45
1
💬 :
I might as well shut my mouth
2026-06-17 13:53:54
0
FaiLLi :
Amazing video!!
2026-06-16 23:22:55
1
shorthuman :
I wouldn't say that I agree with the implication that the primary source is always the one to be trusted and secondary sources are not. To use this "event" that happened in your hometown. The creators of the "primary sources" (the victims/witnesses) will say the most crazy things, will make things up, will presume things, will fail to see certain things or misremember then. (Especially in cases of extreme trauma) Yes, they are direct witnesses and maybe even victims, but that doesn't mean that they have a complete understanding of the event that they were part of. Yes, someone might write something in their autobiography, but it doesn't make it reliable info. However a researcher or a journalist is taking multiple primary sources - documents, diaries, samples, interviews different people, hires specialists to study physical objects related to the event etc. will write a textbook or an article or documentary, giving a more nuanced understanding of the issue at hand. Yes, any secondary source will be biased and will be presenting an interpretation of the reality. But so is the case for primary sources crested by humans with the purpose of documentation. (Obviously not talking about physical sources or actual raw data sets)
2026-06-16 22:52:25
18
Arachn8 :
ter she airy
2026-06-16 22:42:42
5
spr0uttttt_o.o :
👏🏽 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
2026-06-17 11:36:03
0
🌺CoconutRiot🌺 :
@z0mb1egxrl
2026-06-17 08:47:44
0
Bored Multi :
What would be primary sources for systems thinking ie white supremacy etc
2026-06-17 13:32:45
0
To see more videos from user @opradea, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
