@bellaredsouth24: Haha don't mind me being silly🤣 #fyp #fypシ

bellaredsouth24
bellaredsouth24
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Wednesday 17 June 2026 09:22:54 GMT
7408
112
3
5

Music

Download

Comments

user9750287611593
eligioleon :
kiss me
2026-08-31 19:34:10
0
jeffreyp484
Cadillac :
2026-06-18 04:33:35
2
lwah686
Lwah :
you make me thirsty😋
2026-08-24 04:14:14
0
To see more videos from user @bellaredsouth24, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

#creatorsearchinsights #blowthisup #xyzbca #trading #tradingtipsandtricks  Types of Drawn Liquidity in the Market Liquidity in the market can appear in many different forms, and understanding these different types helps traders identify where price is most likely to be drawn next. One of the most common forms is equal highs and equal lows. When price creates multiple highs or lows around the same level, it becomes an obvious area where traders are likely to place stop losses and breakout orders. Equal highs represent potential buy-side liquidity, while equal lows represent potential sell-side liquidity. The more obvious and clean the level is, the more attention it can attract. Another important type is data highs and lows, such as previous day high and low, previous week high and low, previous month high and low, or other significant historical highs and lows. These levels are important because they are widely monitored and can contain substantial resting liquidity. Price can often be drawn toward these external levels, especially when they align with the higher-timeframe market narrative. Another form of liquidity can be found through unmitigated Fair Value Gaps (FVGs). An unfilled FVG represents an imbalance created by aggressive price delivery. Although an FVG is not liquidity in the exact same sense as a pool of stop orders, it can act as an important price draw or delivery objective because the market may return to rebalance that inefficiency. When an unmitigated FVG sits near a major liquidity pool, the combination can create an even stronger area of interest. Traders should therefore distinguish between traditional liquidity pools and inefficiencies that can function as magnets for price. Stacked-up sessions are another powerful concept. When multiple trading sessions create highs or lows around similar levels, liquidity can become concentrated in that area. For example, if the Asian, London, and New York sessions repeatedly form highs around the same price, those highs can create a significant pool of buy-side liquidity. The same applies to multiple session lows creating sell-side liquidity. These stacked levels become particularly interesting when they align with other forms of liquidity, such as equal highs, previous day highs, or higher-timeframe levels. Finally, we have higher-timeframe draws, which are often the most important objectives on the chart. A daily, weekly, or monthly high or low can carry significantly more weight than a small intraday swing. Price may move through several lower-timeframe liquidity pools while ultimately being drawn toward a major higher-timeframe objective. This is why liquidity should be viewed hierarchically rather than treating every level equally. A 5-minute equal high may be taken on the way toward a previous week high, meaning the smaller liquidity was simply an intermediate objective rather than the final destination. The key is to build a liquidity hierarchy: identify the major higher-timeframe draw first, then locate the intermediate liquidity pools that price may use along the way. Look for equal highs and lows, data highs and lows, unmitigated FVGs, stacked session highs and lows, and major higher-timeframe levels. When multiple forms of liquidity point toward the same area, that confluence can create a much stronger market narrative. However, liquidity is not a guarantee of where price will go. It is a framework for understanding potential destinations. The best traders do not blindly enter because liquidity exists; they wait for price to approach the draw and then use their execution model—such as displacement, MSS, CISD, IFVG, or another confirmation—to determine whether the anticipated move is actually developing.
#creatorsearchinsights #blowthisup #xyzbca #trading #tradingtipsandtricks Types of Drawn Liquidity in the Market Liquidity in the market can appear in many different forms, and understanding these different types helps traders identify where price is most likely to be drawn next. One of the most common forms is equal highs and equal lows. When price creates multiple highs or lows around the same level, it becomes an obvious area where traders are likely to place stop losses and breakout orders. Equal highs represent potential buy-side liquidity, while equal lows represent potential sell-side liquidity. The more obvious and clean the level is, the more attention it can attract. Another important type is data highs and lows, such as previous day high and low, previous week high and low, previous month high and low, or other significant historical highs and lows. These levels are important because they are widely monitored and can contain substantial resting liquidity. Price can often be drawn toward these external levels, especially when they align with the higher-timeframe market narrative. Another form of liquidity can be found through unmitigated Fair Value Gaps (FVGs). An unfilled FVG represents an imbalance created by aggressive price delivery. Although an FVG is not liquidity in the exact same sense as a pool of stop orders, it can act as an important price draw or delivery objective because the market may return to rebalance that inefficiency. When an unmitigated FVG sits near a major liquidity pool, the combination can create an even stronger area of interest. Traders should therefore distinguish between traditional liquidity pools and inefficiencies that can function as magnets for price. Stacked-up sessions are another powerful concept. When multiple trading sessions create highs or lows around similar levels, liquidity can become concentrated in that area. For example, if the Asian, London, and New York sessions repeatedly form highs around the same price, those highs can create a significant pool of buy-side liquidity. The same applies to multiple session lows creating sell-side liquidity. These stacked levels become particularly interesting when they align with other forms of liquidity, such as equal highs, previous day highs, or higher-timeframe levels. Finally, we have higher-timeframe draws, which are often the most important objectives on the chart. A daily, weekly, or monthly high or low can carry significantly more weight than a small intraday swing. Price may move through several lower-timeframe liquidity pools while ultimately being drawn toward a major higher-timeframe objective. This is why liquidity should be viewed hierarchically rather than treating every level equally. A 5-minute equal high may be taken on the way toward a previous week high, meaning the smaller liquidity was simply an intermediate objective rather than the final destination. The key is to build a liquidity hierarchy: identify the major higher-timeframe draw first, then locate the intermediate liquidity pools that price may use along the way. Look for equal highs and lows, data highs and lows, unmitigated FVGs, stacked session highs and lows, and major higher-timeframe levels. When multiple forms of liquidity point toward the same area, that confluence can create a much stronger market narrative. However, liquidity is not a guarantee of where price will go. It is a framework for understanding potential destinations. The best traders do not blindly enter because liquidity exists; they wait for price to approach the draw and then use their execution model—such as displacement, MSS, CISD, IFVG, or another confirmation—to determine whether the anticipated move is actually developing.

About