@user98762345665: Women #fyp

rs :

Emotinal intelligent btw✌️

konna :

️ 𝕵𝖆𝖒𝖎𝖑 :

Grass is green ahhh post

jakub ✮ :

Philosopher at 8 has spoken

Wojciech :

Fault :

he repeated exactly what she said too 💔

Quasi :

to be fair she said "a lot of" and "most"

Toastyyy✌️ :

Will.on.specialized :

max :

“I am a Redditor and everything fits in my narrative!”

!ewi.🎧 :

True philosopher

Sinan Purtas :

There is a difference in what they both said tho

S :

nanoangstrom :

W particular

Jedna (One) :

The word “most” was completely neglected and left out of the argument though, would be a win debate for if the word “most” wasnt mentioned, it doesnt make sense now: individual said “Most of [subject]’s personalities.” Other individual replied back “[subject]s are bad people]” which doesnt really make a logical argument or full colleration. I do agree, using “most” isnt a good choice either, no one knows everyone personally and cant just put them all in one label. Using “tons” or “most [subject]s ive met’s personalities” would be the best argument. In the end both groups had bad arguments.