China -美食
Region: JP
Thursday 18 June 2026 12:13:40 GMT
1530408
55726
112
10563
Music
Download
Comments
🧶OranitCrochetDolls🧶 :
เศษที่หั่นนั้นเอาไปผัดกระเพราเผ็ดๆ แห้งๆ นะ ดีงามมากกกก😋😋😋
2026-07-24 06:35:47
192
bbb :
ใส่หมูแบบไหนค่ะใคร่รุ้บอกทีจะทำขายค่ะ
2026-06-19 02:50:48
175
qiaoyin.17 :
2026-07-12 08:24:48
74
12tuanngoc :
tôi cũng bán thịt nướng nhưng tôi khá chác là thịt heo và thịt bò tươi sẽ không bao giờ có kết cấu như vậy.
2026-07-19 16:03:08
2
i_mazura77 :
ពេលឆ្អិនមិចអត់ស្មើគ្នាចឹង ហត់មេះ
2026-07-12 10:23:37
3
Fire :
音樂叫什麼名字
2026-07-12 13:20:34
0
ยายจ๋า :
คุณใช้สวนตรงไหนของหมูช่วยบอกหน่อนค่ะ
2026-07-22 03:41:26
0
xiao chen :
2026-07-21 06:48:31
1
Kaw 😛😛 :
ผมขอเศษหมูที่หั่นทิ้งได้ไหมเอาผัดกินน่าจะอร่อย😀😀😀
2026-07-23 21:14:21
0
산소퐁퐁 :
고기 자른 짜투리는 어캐 활용하나요? 😅😅😅
2026-07-17 08:49:29
0
🫦JimMyDY💞 :
สามชั้น แช่เย็นให้เเข็งแต่ไม่ถึงขั้นฟรีซ เพื่อให้หั่นเป็นสี่เหลี่ยมง่ายๆ
2026-07-23 10:24:46
1
🎉 389🎉 :
2026-07-22 10:59:02
2
Direction :
จกกับข้าวเหนียวนะ หืมมม
2026-07-22 01:16:08
1
หนึ่งเดียว หนึ่งเดียว :
อลังการ
2026-07-21 08:49:02
1
suryowening :
daging sapi kah
2026-07-14 23:49:31
0
12tuanngoc :
thịt gì đẹp vậy ta
2026-07-18 05:52:54
0
P. Mar_Modeling Bkk. :
一根棍子多少元？🥰
2026-07-26 21:01:16
0
Doraemon Hola :
ได้ไอเดียมาจากหมูปิ้งที่ไทยแน่ๆ 😂😂
2026-07-24 10:41:56
1
Mimie :
2026-07-26 06:06:22
0
XCxxCc :
หมูปลอมไหม
2026-07-25 15:43:09
0
อ๋องไม่ใช่เอ๋ง :
หมูประเทศไทย หมูนมสด ไม่มีความอร่อยเลย😂
2026-07-26 13:14:15
0
ห่านฟ้า :
น่าทานค่ะ
2026-06-19 03:49:58
0
To see more videos from user @hjif1120, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3↑↑↑↑3, if n=1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3, if n≥2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. || #fyp #targetaudience #viral #trending #blowthisup](/video/cover/7667120307056004383.webp)
