@el_licenciadoyoryi: Reacción a la jugada del cucho Hernández y gol de campaz #cuchohernandez #seleccioncolombia #colombiavsuzbekistan #mundial2026 #fyp

🇨🇴El profe Jorge ⚽👨‍🎓

Open In TikTok:

Region: CO

Thursday 18 June 2026 14:08:57 GMT

73098

3316

17

17

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (2.71MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (2.71MB) Watermark .mp4 (6.61MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Paolo Joe :

Soy peruano y lo celebre como un colombiano más ❤️⚽️

2026-06-18 20:05:28

115

Tavo :

Quieren saber más que uno de futbol

2026-06-18 16:57:32

31

Alexander Cl :

Colombia nos dio lo que Brasil no pudo. Grande Cucho Hernández 😌✨

2026-06-19 00:51:43

16

Diego :

Yo soy mundial! Yo soy Mundial! como mi Selección

2026-06-18 16:53:39

11

Marday UGC :

yo no me lo vi por andar tapándome los ojos😩

2026-06-19 00:54:25

1

ivanchino98 :

ese Cuchi es un guerrero 💪

2026-06-18 17:25:35

3

Cris_Agüe🇵🇾 :

Que hermoso es el fútbol 🇨🇴

2026-06-18 20:17:34

3

Julián Carvajal :

Cucholian

2026-06-18 21:44:35

2

🇨🇴MAED😎🇨🇴 :

una belleza..

2026-06-19 00:01:23

1

Jr Prime :

ese Man tuvo que apostar al 3-1 pa lucharla asi

2026-06-18 22:22:47

1

฿фṪEяØ :

🥰🥰🥰

2026-06-18 23:36:35

0

yaqueline :

😻😻😻

2026-06-18 23:58:20

0

Samuel B.R :

😁😁😁

2026-06-18 19:14:03

0

⭕️Yo !t’s Ros ⭕️®️🇧🇴 :

😍😍😍

2026-06-18 18:21:14

0

elcira gurrero :

😇😇

2026-06-19 04:07:00

0

To see more videos from user @el_licenciadoyoryi, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

السيروم جداً حلو مدخلته عنايتي بعد 🙂‍↔️♥️ فولو اذا تحِب العنايه 💘

السيروم جداً حلو مدخلته عنايتي بعد 🙂‍↔️♥️ فولو اذا تحِب العنايه 💘

Ts so ahh… //Ib@Xynx #juve #juventus #yildiz #kenanyildiz #smooth

Ts so ahh… //Ib@Xynx #juve #juventus #yildiz #kenanyildiz #smooth

$Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 #fyp #truecringecomunnity #tcc #edit$
Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 #fyp #truecringecomunnity #tcc #edit

😈😈😈😈

😈😈😈😈

#حادي

Afsos pakhtno wo afghannao bandi 🥺🥺@Waliullah SAHIBZADA #waliarmy🔥 #nizamoedit #waliarmy #Aj #foryoupage

Afsos pakhtno wo afghannao bandi 🥺🥺@Waliullah SAHIBZADA #waliarmy🔥 #nizamoedit #waliarmy #Aj #foryoupage

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy