@mustafa_jahangir: Al mustafa caterers ki biryani ma sha Allah fully rasili or ak ak chawal khilta howa #foryou #reels #viralvideo #biryanilovers #biryani

Al mustafa catering and pakwan
Al mustafa catering and pakwan
Open In TikTok:
Region: PK
Thursday 18 June 2026 15:50:03 GMT
16484
492
12
21

Music

Download

Comments

hajisardarmuhammadandson
حاجی سردار محمد اینڈ سنز :
mashallah
2026-06-20 04:22:42
1
shahzadbhatti6400
Shahzad Bhatti 6400 :
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
2026-06-19 04:48:40
3
malik.farooq313
🫠Malick.. S..🫀 :
mashalla 🥰
2026-06-19 12:15:13
1
officially.beast0
Officially beast Prince :
👍👍👍👍👍
2026-06-19 12:09:47
1
hassanjaam302
Hassan :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-06-19 20:23:54
1
hajisardarmuhammadandson
حاجی سردار محمد اینڈ سنز :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-06-20 04:22:33
1
hajisardarmuhammadandson
حاجی سردار محمد اینڈ سنز :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-06-20 04:22:30
1
farooq.shaikh79
Farooq shaikh :
👌👌👌
2026-06-20 06:48:28
0
malik.farooq313
🫠Malick.. S..🫀 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-06-19 12:14:44
1
f.k79357
FK FOODS 🥇 :
❤️
2026-06-18 16:43:20
1
faraz.ahmed.khuharo
faraz ahmed khuharo :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-06-18 16:28:11
1
shahzadbhatti6400
Shahzad Bhatti 6400 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-06-19 04:46:51
2
To see more videos from user @mustafa_jahangir, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

আর্জেন্টিনার লাভাররা রেডি আছো তো Maksudnya🇦🇷😊  baju mahal kebesaran. Warna gelap & netral: Hitam, navy, abu, olive = auto tegas. Rapi dari ujung rambut: Rambut, kuku, sepatu bersih. Berantakan = wibawa drop. Jangan kebanyakan aksesoris: 1 jam tangan cukup. Hashtag #BadDay Edition Kalau mau post OOTD pas lagi bad day tapi tetep berwibawa: #BerwibawaDuluBadDayKemudian #OutfitTegas #CleanLook #MenInBlack Mau dijadiin versi nongkrong, kondangan, atau kampus? Kasih tau aja acaranya, biar ku-racikin yang pas." width="135" height="240">
আর্জেন্টিনার লাভাররা রেডি আছো তো Maksudnya🇦🇷😊 "outfit cowok berwibawa" buat ngatasin bad day ya? 😎 Biar tetep keliatan tegas + pede walau lagi bad mood, kuncinya: simpel, rapi, dan warnanya netral. Outfit yang berwibawa = bikin orang auto segan. 3 Formula Outfit Cowok Berwibawa Anti Bad Day 1. Smart Casual CEO Mode Buat kuliah, kerja, atau nongkrong tapi tetep disegani Atasan: Kemeja oxford polos warna navy, hitam, atau putih. Gulung lengan dikit. Bawahan: Celana chino/ankle pants warna khaki, charcoal, atau hitam. No sobek-sobek. Sepatu: Loafers, chelsea boots, atau sneakers putih bersih. Extra: Jam tangan kulit/steel + kacamata hitam. Vibes: Tenang tapi dominan. Bad day langsung minggir. 2. Monokrom Minimalist Paling gampang tapi efeknya kuat Atasan: Kaos crew neck/henley hitam fit di badan, jangan kebesaran. Bawahan: Celana bahan hitam atau jeans black wash slim fit. Outer: Overshirt atau chore jacket warna senada. Sepatu: Boots atau sneakers full black. Vibes: Misterius, fokus, nggak banyak drama. 3. Old Money Clean Look Keliatan mahal tanpa logo gede Atasan: Polo shirt rapi atau kemeja linen warna earth tone: olive, cream, mocca. Bawahan: Celana bahan straight cut warna beige/off-white. Sepatu: White sneakers premium atau penny loafers. Extra: Ikat pinggang kulit, rambut klimis rapi. Vibes: Dewasa, berkelas, bad day jadi nggak berani ganggu. Kunci Berwibawa Biar Bad Day Kalah: Fit is king: Baju yang pas di badan > baju mahal kebesaran. Warna gelap & netral: Hitam, navy, abu, olive = auto tegas. Rapi dari ujung rambut: Rambut, kuku, sepatu bersih. Berantakan = wibawa drop. Jangan kebanyakan aksesoris: 1 jam tangan cukup. Hashtag #BadDay Edition Kalau mau post OOTD pas lagi bad day tapi tetep berwibawa: #BerwibawaDuluBadDayKemudian #OutfitTegas #CleanLook #MenInBlack Mau dijadiin versi nongkrong, kondangan, atau kampus? Kasih tau aja acaranya, biar ku-racikin yang pas.
Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form  a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is  g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3↑↑↑↑3,	 if  n=1  and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3,	 if  n≥2.  {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #sinister #fyp #hullo #garyplauche #mariannebechmeier
Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3↑↑↑↑3, if n=1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3, if n≥2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #sinister #fyp #hullo #garyplauche #mariannebechmeier

About