@lifeisskary: #Efilism #Antinatalism #life #truth #nature

End :

What was his point here?

Major_tom_97 :

life is beautiful, harsh but beautiful

David :

Who’s the guy in the audio

pranexx :

This guy is irate and his thoughts are not clear. I’m an atheist and I find empathy in all living things because they only have one life. I think one’s nature is part of there person but our human ability to self reflect is made to make us more efficient animals to learn and bend our environment. My deity is science and there will always be more to discover and learn. I am a creature blessed by the microscope chance to live just like any other plant, bug, or person.

☼ :

No atheist things the universe is simple, we just think religion isn’t the correct answer

Mellowcreme pumpkins :

As an atheist I have empathy and my heart bleeds for the suffering too, the universe has no intrinsic meaning I’ve never heard an atheist say what he’s claiming, sure some people might think that but he’s lumping atheists when they are notorious for not agreeing on much

Playboicarti :

seanv2 :

who is the speaker

trappedinmaya :

trvth

ⒶdimlitⒶ :

i wish these where my words, hes so right, he gets it

BlockWontStop :

when reality becomes to much it's hard to look deeper than surface level.

￴ ￴ ￴￴ ￴ ￴￴ ￴ ￴￴ ￴ ￴￴ ￴ ￴ ￴ :

nobody here watched more than 30 seconds of this video and it shows

Vanith Vild :

The point of the video is atheists justify nature. People aren’t fully atheist; they’re atheists who believe in an afterlife, multiverses, spirituality, etc. They justify the natural order of the world, which is chaotic. If you hate the natural order, then you aren’t atheist; you’re an efilist.

watersheep89 :

I saw a pigeon eating breadcrumbs on concrete how do you explain this huh?

Physical Remover :

Big problem is that the overview on life and suffering is subjective, a posteriori. Some people say they hate it, some people say they like it. Most people, still, live mostly according to their emotional desires. To say that life creates suffering is technically correct, but it can also generate net positive joy. If suffering would be an objectively "bad" thing. You can't decide on a total, objective decision over values determined by the subjective evaluations of what we're handling. It's their very nature. Net suffering is subjective. Dependent on them.

windowsill :

You can’t be a theist and anti life, those two positions held together make less sense than even being atheist

Kyle :

False.

goetia666 :

interesting

🤓 :

jackal0043 :

حياة مليئة بالشكوك والتناقضات العجيبة ، لاشيء مفهوم او واضح

Enzo :

man creates god, god creates man no more explanation than that

Marius :

song name?