1. Home
  2. Detail

@user67251155285571: #اتنسيت #الشوق #saloka

Thoughts خيالـ
Thoughts خيالـ
Open In TikTok:
Region: IQ
Friday 19 June 2026 19:34:13 GMT
2857
133
0
7

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0.48MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0.48MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @user67251155285571, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Si pudieras - Orquesta la cosa nostra 🥺 #salsa #saborsalsero #salseros
Si pudieras - Orquesta la cosa nostra 🥺 #salsa #saborsalsero #salseros
🤍~#fyp
🤍~#fyp
#tik_tok_ #cuisine #cuisinealgerienne🇩🇿 #شعب_صيني_ماله_حل😂😂 #chef
#tik_tok_ #cuisine #cuisinealgerienne🇩🇿 #شعب_صيني_ماله_حل😂😂 #chef
#buon_tam_trang #tramsuy
#buon_tam_trang #tramsuy
#suho — Ohh beom seok when I catch you. || #weakhero #fyp #viral #choihyunwook ALL FAKE TIKTOK — scp: allscpdramas
#suho — Ohh beom seok when I catch you. || #weakhero #fyp #viral #choihyunwook ALL FAKE TIKTOK — scp: allscpdramas
🇬🇧 🧠 Motorola 68000 vs Intel 8086/8088: two opposite philosophies When the Motorola 68000 was released in 1979, Intel already dominated the market with the 8086 (1978) and 8088. Although they appear similar on paper, their architectures represent two fundamentally different design philosophies. 🔹 Internal architecture Motorola 68000 True 32-bit internal architecture 32-bit ALU Intel 8086 / 8088 16-bit architecture 16-bit ALU 🔹 Memory addressing 68000: 24-bit linear addressing → 16 MB 8086/8088: 20-bit addressing (1 MB) 🔹 Historical outcome 68000 → Macintosh, Amiga, Atari ST, Sun, industrial systems 8086/8088 → IBM PC → PC ecosystem dominance 👉 The 68000 won technically. Intel won commercially. IBM chose the 8088, not for technical excellence, but for cost and compatibility (8-bit bus). That single decision locked x86 in as the global standard. The 68000 didn’t lose. 👉 It was outvoted by economics. 🇫🇷 🧠 Motorola 68000 vs Intel 8086/8088 : deux philosophies opposées Lorsque le Motorola 68000 apparaît en 1979, Intel domine déjà le marché avec le 8086 (1978) et le 8088. Sur le papier, ils semblent comparables. En réalité, leurs architectures reflètent deux visions radicalement différentes. 🔹 Architecture interne Motorola 68000 Architecture entièrement 32 bits en interne ALU 32 bits Intel 8086 / 8088 Architecture 16 bits ALU 16 bits 🔹 Impact historique 68000 → Macintosh, Amiga, Atari ST, Sun, systèmes industriels 8088 / 8086 → IBM PC → domination du monde PC 👉 Techniquement, le 68000 était supérieur. Commercialement, Intel a gagné. IBM a choisi le 8088, non pour ses qualités techniques, mais pour réduire les coûts (bus 8 bits, compatibilité). Ce choix a figé l’architecture x86 comme standard mondial. Le 68000 n’a pas perdu. 👉 Il a été sacrifié au profit de la compatibilité et du business. #microscope #computer #cpu #retrogaming #electronic
🇬🇧 🧠 Motorola 68000 vs Intel 8086/8088: two opposite philosophies When the Motorola 68000 was released in 1979, Intel already dominated the market with the 8086 (1978) and 8088. Although they appear similar on paper, their architectures represent two fundamentally different design philosophies. 🔹 Internal architecture Motorola 68000 True 32-bit internal architecture 32-bit ALU Intel 8086 / 8088 16-bit architecture 16-bit ALU 🔹 Memory addressing 68000: 24-bit linear addressing → 16 MB 8086/8088: 20-bit addressing (1 MB) 🔹 Historical outcome 68000 → Macintosh, Amiga, Atari ST, Sun, industrial systems 8086/8088 → IBM PC → PC ecosystem dominance 👉 The 68000 won technically. Intel won commercially. IBM chose the 8088, not for technical excellence, but for cost and compatibility (8-bit bus). That single decision locked x86 in as the global standard. The 68000 didn’t lose. 👉 It was outvoted by economics. 🇫🇷 🧠 Motorola 68000 vs Intel 8086/8088 : deux philosophies opposées Lorsque le Motorola 68000 apparaît en 1979, Intel domine déjà le marché avec le 8086 (1978) et le 8088. Sur le papier, ils semblent comparables. En réalité, leurs architectures reflètent deux visions radicalement différentes. 🔹 Architecture interne Motorola 68000 Architecture entièrement 32 bits en interne ALU 32 bits Intel 8086 / 8088 Architecture 16 bits ALU 16 bits 🔹 Impact historique 68000 → Macintosh, Amiga, Atari ST, Sun, systèmes industriels 8088 / 8086 → IBM PC → domination du monde PC 👉 Techniquement, le 68000 était supérieur. Commercialement, Intel a gagné. IBM a choisi le 8088, non pour ses qualités techniques, mais pour réduire les coûts (bus 8 bits, compatibilité). Ce choix a figé l’architecture x86 comme standard mondial. Le 68000 n’a pas perdu. 👉 Il a été sacrifié au profit de la compatibilité et du business. #microscope #computer #cpu #retrogaming #electronic

About

Legal