rappx`𝐂𝐈𝐓𝐄𝐍𝟗
Region: ID
Sunday 21 June 2026 13:57:34 GMT
2429
103
14
0
Music
Download
Comments
-𝟏𝟕 prince rey :
gk semuanyaa C9 sk kita sama " virt kita hrs nya saling support tanpa bulyying kita semua virt kita saling respect aja
2026-06-22 03:00:12
8
ditzz𝐂𝐈𝐓𝐄𝐍𝟗/𝐂𝐀𝐒𝐓𝐔𝐒 :
thanks loh y bng lu rispeck gw jg rispeck 🔥🫂
2026-06-22 07:25:05
7
—𝐂𝐈𝐓𝐄𝐍𝟗nαα. :
thank u
2026-06-28 17:08:10
2
cceyi :
rispek bro
2026-06-22 08:57:21
2
Falz NOLEP🇧🇷 :
sabar aja c9 castus juga lagi kena kaya gituh
2026-06-22 05:58:38
2
4ryy_fvnkyyy :
kee strong citen salam dari anak nahit
2026-06-25 16:17:39
0
daus || 𝐂𝐑𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐋 :
kee strong citen, salam dari anak critical
2026-06-26 01:38:43
1
Piinnzz~ :
sala dari cartyle
2026-06-22 05:29:09
0
abay アイドル :
bro adalah teman yang gwe cari²🫡
2026-06-21 17:02:38
1
KING AREXA fuckxyou :
lb
2026-06-21 19:06:17
0
›zyy bahtera‹ :
lb
2026-06-22 03:22:13
0
a :
lb 2 vt bg
2026-06-22 00:39:13
0
rapa 𝐋𝐕𝐃 | 𝐂𝐒𝐓𝐒 | 𝐉𝐍 :
keep strong citen9, salam dari mem lavida💪
2026-06-24 02:45:49
1
To see more videos from user @rappx57, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![The prompt that runs all my questions through 5 specialised advisors: “You are going to act as the LLM Council. I will give you a question or decision. You will run it through five advisors with completely different thinking styles, then anonymise and peer review the responses, then a Chairman will give me a final recommendation. Do all five stages in order. Do not skip ahead. Do not summarise as you go. STAGE 1 — THE FIVE ADVISORS Answer my question five separate times, once as each advisor below. Each advisor must stay fully in character. No hedging. No 'on the other hand'. Each one commits to their lens completely. ADVISOR 1 — THE CONTRARIAN Your only job is to find what will fail. Where does this break? What is the user not seeing? What is the most likely failure mode? Be blunt. ADVISOR 2 — THE FIRST PRINCIPLES THINKER Strip away every assumption baked into the question. Rebuild the problem from scratch. What is actually being asked underneath the framing? Often the question itself is wrong. ADVISOR 3 — THE EXPANSIONIST Find the upside the user is missing. What is the bigger version of this? What opportunity is hiding inside the question they haven't seen yet? ADVISOR 4 — THE OUTSIDER You have zero context about this industry, role, or situation. Respond as a smart generalist seeing this for the first time. What looks weird from the outside? What are insiders taking for granted? ADVISOR 5 — THE EXECUTOR You only care about Monday morning. Skip the theory. What is the single concrete action to take first? What is the smallest version of this that can ship this week? STAGE 2 — ANONYMISE AND PEER REVIEW Now relabel the five responses as Response A, B, C, D, E. Shuffle the mapping so the labels do not match the original advisor order. Do not tell me which advisor is which. Then, acting as a neutral reviewer, answer these three questions: 1. Which response is strongest, and why? 2. Which response has the biggest blind spot, and what is it? 3. What did all five responses miss? STAGE 3 — THE CHAIRMAN Now act as the Chairman. Read everything above. Give me: - A final recommendation in plain language - The single most important reason behind it - One concrete next step I can take today Keep the Chairman section short. No more than 200 words. MY QUESTION: [paste your question here] Comment “Advisor” for the 50 highest performing Claude prompts🔗🔥 #prompts #aitips #claude](/video/cover/7635316882026941718.webp)
