@forbidden.azazel: Part 21 | Contradictions in the Quran #quran #islamicphilosophy #debate #exmuslim #qurancontradictions

🇾🇪أ :

i’m not even gonna bother reply to this one

ph_wert :

this account is so important !

Hamza :

The first example you showed was comparison to a thunderbolt it wasn’t literally saying that it a thunderbolt was used and the other examples you showed in the video was descriptions of what happened to the people of Aad

mr.blobby22 :

Thank you for the video. Appreciate you sharing the insights. Only other point I have is that every time I watch one of your videos - I need to take a certain test (it's the voice and the eyes).

Russian_penguin :

They were destroyed with both lighting and wind

🇾🇪أ :

The Qur’an does not say that ʿĀd were destroyed by two separate punishments that contradict each other. The main punishment mentioned for ʿĀd is a violent wind: “a furious screaming wind” (Qur’an 69:6–7) and “a screaming wind” (Qur’an 54:19). The word ṣāʿiqah (صاعقة), sometimes translated as “thunderbolt,” does not always mean a literal lightning strike; in Arabic it can mean a devastating strike, blast, or overwhelming destruction depending on context. For Thamūd, the Qur’an mentions a blast/shout (ṣayḥah) and an earthquake (Qur’an 11:67, 7:78). So the descriptions are not saying the same people were punished by two different methods at once; rather, different Arabic words are used to describe different punishments or the destructive event, with the context showing the main form of destruction.

Muslim Responder :

who cares what you think

maxiamalian :

None of your evidence said anything about hurricanes. It said rain and wind which come with thunderbolts.

VvV :

Why are u staring into my soul

Read Quran :

ste_827 :

👏👏👏

mplove712 :

👍

paulo.gme :

@️

selxne :

Every time a clear contradiction is pointed out the defense is always 'well this Arabic word actually means 50 different things depending on context' 💀 if a text requires this much linguistic stretching and mental gymnastics just to avoid a basic factual error its definitly not meant to be a 'clear book/guide' for all of mankind since litterly no one can agree on one definition. anyways your argument is very logical and critical!

akenfenwa :

keep it up ,religions downfall needs to be done