Get Rich With Rach
Region: AU
Tuesday 23 June 2026 03:52:32 GMT
77258
3867
321
554
Music
Download
Comments
Grugster3000 :
Good decision. I like it. Housing for people, not profit.
2026-06-23 06:05:37
439
Christopher Mirto :
Thanks for explaining. Personally I love this. I’m all for Mums and Dads buying an investment property for their nest egg but I think we’ve lost the plot with how quickly housing prices are rising and this sounds like a way to limit people scaling their investments into housing.
2026-06-23 04:16:09
306
Cczzz :
Good . Houses are for living not investing
2026-06-23 10:10:53
77
Twinklestar :
If Australian tax wasn't that high, people wouldn't need to use investment to reduce tax....
2026-06-23 12:27:09
125
Danni Fanny :
no one is understanding that this is great for first home buyers because less investors will be in the market
2026-06-23 20:22:25
35
Peter Dmitriev :
Thank god, good in both alp and greens
2026-06-23 05:49:51
82
king ranch pepperino 🇦🇺 :
the government wants citizens to stay as a worker and pay high tax. they don't want citizens to thrive financially at all.
2026-06-23 12:43:32
14
SKT :
Perhaps the bigger question is why we encourage passive investment in residential housing at all. Housing is a basic human need, yet we have built a system where people can accumulate wealth simply by owning an asset, while others pay increasing amounts just to have somewhere to live. If people want to invest, then investment should create value. Build businesses. Fund innovation. Develop housing. Improve properties. Create jobs. Take risk and contribute something tangible. What concerns me is when residential property becomes a passive wealth-generation tool where the return comes primarily from rising house prices and rent increases rather than from improving the quality of housing itself. If you're going to profit from housing, there should be a corresponding responsibility to maintain, improve, and contribute to the housing stock. Investment should reward value creation, not simply asset ownership. The issue isn't property investment itself. It's whether the system rewards contribution or merely rewards holding scarce assets while others bear the cost.
2026-06-23 11:52:09
16
Jaimee Tessmann :
Isn’t the $500k figure a bit high? My understanding is that many SMSF property purchases are made by couples combining their super balances, with most lenders willing to lend when the combined balance is closer to $200k-$300k plus buffers. Wouldn’t that mean the affected group is larger than just those with $500k already in super?
2026-06-23 06:59:48
10
kellysims :
So glad for this. Build new for cap gains … we need more houses
2026-06-23 04:58:14
20
steves_Gambit :
It’s the random patronising smiles while talking then instantly into a serious face that get me. Why though?
2026-06-26 23:23:37
0
Jon Mann :
Great explanation of this, and it’s refreshing to see this explained without getting all political
2026-06-23 12:42:20
14
Condor :
explained it well Rach..
2026-06-23 06:00:16
20
Rickie Gilmore :
the amount of people who comment on these reforms and actually dont understand how they impact them is wild. more content like this is needed to explain the changes and more people need to listen and comprehend
2026-06-23 07:43:36
16
Footy Burner 12 :
Silly move by labor. These smsf redo purchases must be used for rental income, they can’t be tenanted by the owner. So it does nothing but not help the rental market
2026-06-23 08:38:54
7
Bobalicious74 :
So you can invest in a larger fund (in property) with your smsf but not on your own? Sounds like more money to big corporations funnelled by government policy
2026-06-23 04:44:32
6
Alicia | Mortgage Broker :
I honestly wish I could show your videos to all my my clients you explain things SO well 👏👏👏👏
2026-06-23 09:25:39
7
GolfingInShambles :
I've never heard someone so passionate about this before
2026-06-23 09:49:28
0
Gremic :
SMSF generally under perform. Let them keep it, they mess it up
2026-06-23 10:08:13
1
Brainrot🇦🇺 :
So this change only applies to residential?
2026-06-23 10:16:39
2
cayt_ust_ :
You are my favourite Tiktokker!
2026-06-23 09:26:16
1
Goldynt :
Alice Springs can be as high as 9%
2026-06-23 13:23:52
0
Roo-Mint :
Insane another labor disaster
2026-06-24 02:00:25
1
CLVR :
how can an SMSF own a commercial property that the members operate a business from? doesn't there need to be some arms length something something, or can't personally benefit from the fun until retirement. basically isnt it a conflict of interest?
2026-06-23 09:27:57
0
Natasha Khan :
Sorry random question- are you a scorpio star sign?
2026-06-24 11:23:57
0
To see more videos from user @getrichwithrach, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
