@exploringlove: ouu shii👀👀 #philosophy #god

Classical Larp 🇻🇦 :

Motion is kinda bad

Fico🇻🇦 :

what do you think of Joe schimds objection to first cause?

Misfit 🏴 :

Soul reaper :

yoo the 4th arguments from Thomas is so tuff

y.ahya1 :

I don’t think that Ibn sina proof is diachronic, corruptio et generatio (the third way I believe) is in fact diachronic bcz it based in time and not in a synchronic and hierarchical contingency

Dylan :

Background ball knowledge (Grothendieck)

Xiao Zhan :

i still don't understand

Poldo :

thank you

4D khal🌹 :

Soichi :

ninja creami formatted arguments like premises 😭 anyways aquinas gets buried

glucose_ :

Argument from Motion traditionally is parasitic on act/potency realism. And deflationist accounts of change; explain change while not being committed to potency being a real feature of the world. Therefore the APR thesis incurs more ontic-tax than the deflationist change thesis, meaning it is more probable because it is more parsimonious and it esplains all the change data. That means the motion argument never comes off because it’s metaphysically bloated. How do you deal with this objection

Nature enthusiast :

teleological 🤦🏻

mist3rchopper :

and this proves God?