𝔟𝔢𝔫 ⊬ 𝔤𝔬𝔡
Region: US
Tuesday 23 June 2026 18:32:22 GMT
2846
235
55
12
Music
Download
Comments
Silver :
Same goes with history
2026-06-25 17:18:38
2
X9J115 :
No, the gospels don’t all rely on one source that’s just a straight up lie. Also you can make a good argument that Peter was behind the gospel of mark even if he didn’t write it
2026-06-23 22:33:33
0
Apple User224344322 :
Love you 🙏🙏
2026-06-24 16:34:36
4
𝐻𝑜𝓅𝑒 :
There is no contradiction at all. If x says Jesus last words, those are what they heard, but someone could satued more to continue listening, its not a contradiction
2026-07-04 07:26:19
2
. :
The New Testament is written by eye witnesses Matthew mark luke and John were all disciples of Jesus not like actullay he was a doctor Matthew mark and John where with Jesus when he was going and spreading the truth , then also the angel told Joseph to go to Egypt with Jesus and they returned back to Nazareth that’s why bout verses saud that I think you should’ve read that part in more detail bro
2026-06-23 21:12:28
1
Tyler Thompson :
Look at my last comment on this thread. I’ll just copy and paste it here for you: And here is what I mean by some of what you say isn’t really accurate or doesn’t paint the whole picture or aren’t as detrimental as you may think they are: The eyewitness argument cuts both ways. Luke literally opens his gospel saying he interviewed eyewitnesses and compiled a careful account. That’s not a flaw, that’s exactly what a good historian does. Papias writing around 130 AD says Mark recorded Peter’s preaching directly. These aren’t anonymous documents. Matthew and Luke using Mark as a source doesn’t discredit them either. It means they valued reliable testimony. Two historians drawing from the same primary source isn’t fabrication, it’s responsible scholarship. And the Egypt thing isn’t a contradiction, you just have the details mixed up. Matthew covers the flight to Egypt to escape Herod. Luke covers the temple presentation and return to Nazareth. Different parts of the story with different emphases. Harmonize them and the sequence is perfectly coherent. That argument falls apart the moment you actually read both passages instead of trusting a summary of them
2026-06-25 16:38:03
0
Tyler Thompson :
I’m not going to pretend to have the “comebacks” to each of these things off the top of my head, but these things you stated are very very simple and obvious things that you say are contradictions… don’t you think that with how extensively the Bible has been studied by Christians and non Christian’s that someone would have pointed these things out and proven them true hundreds or thousands of years ago if they were accurate?
2026-06-24 14:45:44
0
Steve Olin FC :
So obvy
2026-06-24 04:59:19
2
Michel :
yeah, it's just a theory. Funny though if he would be inspired by buddhism and stuff, because christians usually think that their beliefs are so exclusive and unique 😏
2026-06-26 08:19:40
0
Fade🌹🐺 :
gang Idk if you wanna open up this can of worms😭🙏
2026-06-23 19:01:27
0
unathi :) :
let’s wake it up.
2026-06-27 15:33:32
3
Michel :
did you ever hear the theory that Jesus was in Asia learning about Eastern philosophy? Between the age of 12 and 30 there is nothing written about his life. Romour has it the Three Wise Men invited him to learn about buddhism, daoism, confusianism. Hence f.e. Jesus' almost literal quote from Kong Fuzi: do not do onto others that what you don't want to be done to you. For what it's worth of course, because most stories and theories about Jesus are bs anyway imo......🤔
2026-06-23 18:50:49
1
themcauleytuckershow :
I think you bring up some real issues that people should actually take seriously. The fact that the Gospels were written decades after Jesus’ death, that Matthew and Luke appear to use Mark as a source, and that there are differences between the accounts are all things that biblical scholars discuss. Christians shouldn’t have to pretend those questions don’t exist. Where I think the argument goes too far is moving from “the Bible has human elements and complexities” to “therefore you cannot trust it.” The idea that Matthew and Luke used Mark doesn’t automatically make their accounts unreliable. A lot of ancient writers used earlier sources. The question isn’t simply “did they use another source?” but “how did they use it, and are their claims historically credible?” The contradictions point is also more complicated. Some differences between the Gospels are genuinely difficult, and I don’t think every explanation people give is equally convincing. But a difference between accounts doesn’t automatically prove that the entire thing is false. When historians study ancient sources, they don’t usually expect every detail to line up perfectly like four modern reporters writing the same article. The biggest thing I would push back on is the idea that if God inspired Scripture, we should expect every writing style, perspective, or detail to look exactly the same. That assumes a particular definition of inspiration. A Christian who believes in inspiration doesn’t necessarily have to believe God dictated every sentence like a transcript. Many Christians throughout history have believed God worked through human authors with their own styles, perspectives, and historical contexts. The manuscript and translation question is also fair. There are thousands of manuscripts, and there are differences between them. But that’s actually why textual criticism exists. Scholars compare those manuscripts to figure out the earliest recoverable wording. The existence of manuscript differences doesn’t automatically mean we have no idea what the text originally said.
2026-07-07 05:36:37
0
Jay hearts :
❤️
2026-07-05 18:45:50
1
♱ soza ♱🇻🇦 :
@Jesus and whatnot
2026-06-23 18:43:49
1
w1ll :
@Jesus and whatnot
2026-06-23 18:45:52
0
ً :
@Diss Deity
2026-06-23 18:50:00
0
Laxus :
@𝘋𝘪𝘯𝘹 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘗𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘵
2026-06-23 20:13:52
0
werkin :
@Jesus and whatnot
2026-06-24 06:16:54
0
Darren :
Oh yes, it’s totally unreliable cause over hundreds of years and completely different continents. The book lines are perfectly and Jesus fulfills over 300 prophecies. Yeah that’s totally coincidence.
2026-06-23 18:54:02
0
mushinvon :
Js compare it to other religions people are so quick to claim Zoroastrian, Sumerian or even Hindu gods as mythology but if we keep the same critical analysis the same can be said for Abrahamic ones
2026-07-06 21:45:41
0
To see more videos from user @it_isben, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
