@cancel.the.state: this is a blueprint. #breakingnews #edutokcontest

Meet the Jess :

Ashleyaffinity :

So the first amendment doesn’t exist

susanherzberg :

What the fuck!!!!!!

Beth 🖤 :

They’ll win on appeal.

Christy Deryn :

A jury did this? shameful

MOO :

Ok, I’m an Australian 🇦🇺. I have a question- Doesn’t the American constitution and the bill of rights give all Americans the right of free speech and the right to protest? I’m scratching my head trying to understand. The 50 year sentences are, to me, just mind blowing. God bless 🥰🙏

The Great Depression :

Why isn’t this in the fucking news?

₳₴₮Ɽ₳Ⱡ🫠₮Ɽ₳₴Ⱨ :

ITS WAY PAST TIME guys

Sara Contreras :

Making these protestors examples of what will happen if you PROTEST.

Norah Lynn :

Oh we’re in the bad place aren’t we

HEATHEN🇨🇦 :

@HEATHEN🇨🇦: The Sentences BreakdownsA federal judge handed down exceptionally long, consecutive "stacked" sentences to eight total defendants:50 Years: Cameron Arnold, Savanna Batten, Zachary Evetts, Bradford Morris, and Elizabeth Soto each received a 50-year term.70 Years: Maricela Rueda was sentenced to 70 years.100 Years: Benjamin Hanil Song, a former U.S. Marine Corps reservist who fired the shot that wounded the Alvarado police officer, was sentenced to 100 years for attempted murder.30 Years: Daniel Rolando Sanchez-Estrada was sentenced to 30 years for hiding document files, though he was not present at the demonstration scene.The Charges and Government CaseFederal prosecutors treated the group as an organized "North Texas Antifa cell", making this case the first significant conviction under DOJ domestic counter-terrorism initiatives targeting antifascist activists. The government argued that the protesters engaged in a pre-planned, violent ambush involving explosives (commercial fireworks), body armor, and firearm use. They were convicted of charges including providing material support to terrorists, rioting, and conspiracy involving explosives.The Defense ResponseDefense attorneys, families, and civil rights advocates have strongly disputed the terrorism charges and the severity of the sentences. The defense maintained that the gathering was intended as a loud but peaceful "noise demonstration" to support detained immigrants.Attorneys noted that several of the individuals given 50-year terms did not carry weapons, paint, or plan any violence. They argued the defendants were linked largely through a local left-wing book club and a zine printing press. Defense teams have officially stated their intention to appeal the verdicts.If you would like to know more about this case, I can provide the specific legal arguments used by the prosecution, details on the upcoming sentencings for the remaining defendants, or the constitutional criticisms raised by civil liberties groups. TERRIBLE

Goilers :

50 years tells me there has to be more to it "Just being there."

scotty2 :

Pay attention America

Star :

For demanding basic human rights

Daily.Tube 🔷 :

And Trump is walking freely

Luna Grimm :

this is soooooo f'en scary and most aren't taking it seriously enough 🥺

lindamasondutton :

WTF…. This is unbelievable…. 😡

Wake Up 🌈 :

And notice how this is actually high profile but there was zero news coverage on the trials

Tomu 🇨🇦 :

All this and the news is focused on a wading pool 🙄

VonKatzen :

Mariana :

This deserves a lot more attention

GoddessX :

can we all stop going to work and paying bills seriously

jordan leandra :

all the hidden comments???

Pink Moon Collective :

why isn't this on any national news stations? this is incredible.