@daryavarneer:

daryavarneer
daryavarneer
Open In TikTok:
Region: BY
Thursday 25 June 2026 09:41:05 GMT
237795
28403
87
948

Music

Download

Comments

ben_meriem05
Meriem :
u're not alone
2026-06-29 22:26:20
377
chocolatedeeclairs29
Chocola🍫 :
What's the benefits?
2026-07-01 16:05:03
5
minden_privaaa
Privuu🩵☀️🤍🫰🏻 :
you're not alone
2026-07-02 11:04:53
17
xmyrthe_veenx
🩵✨𝓂𝓎𝓇𝓉𝒽ℯ🌙🐬 :
Hello queen 😘
2026-07-01 17:54:41
14
zarish_520
zarish_5 :
One here
2026-07-01 17:41:40
11
ekhutsishvili23
E :
Same girl
2026-06-30 21:14:33
7
rhymssh
rey :
sometimes
2026-07-01 06:11:06
5
_fffraaannn
frannn🫧 :
2026-07-04 05:54:19
1
yoojoonghyukie
🪷 :
Silent repost
2026-07-03 20:32:35
2
To see more videos from user @daryavarneer, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Democracy or Dictatorship? Which system actually represents the will of the people? Does the western model for democracy ever not lead to corruption and oppression? Did Laos add guardrails to their democracy or go too far? Do these questions even matter when people's lives are rapidly improving in measurable ways? Has western democracy actually improved your life in measurable ways or just sent all your taxes to bomb the middle east? Laos held national elections this year under a democratic system that would be unrecognizable to most Western observers. Candidates are forbidden from advertising all together. Each candidate submits exactly one sheet of paper: a fact-checked resume listing credentials, education, work history, and community service for voters to review. The result was 164 contested seats and 98% voter turnout. No billionaire-funded attack ads. No rallies. No slogans. Just records instead of rhetoric. Like all democracies, this democracy was not established peacefully. Laos arrived at this system after enduring the most intensive bombing campaign in human history during America's
Democracy or Dictatorship? Which system actually represents the will of the people? Does the western model for democracy ever not lead to corruption and oppression? Did Laos add guardrails to their democracy or go too far? Do these questions even matter when people's lives are rapidly improving in measurable ways? Has western democracy actually improved your life in measurable ways or just sent all your taxes to bomb the middle east? Laos held national elections this year under a democratic system that would be unrecognizable to most Western observers. Candidates are forbidden from advertising all together. Each candidate submits exactly one sheet of paper: a fact-checked resume listing credentials, education, work history, and community service for voters to review. The result was 164 contested seats and 98% voter turnout. No billionaire-funded attack ads. No rallies. No slogans. Just records instead of rhetoric. Like all democracies, this democracy was not established peacefully. Laos arrived at this system after enduring the most intensive bombing campaign in human history during America's "Secret War," followed by decades of struggle against a US-backed monarchy that banned, jailed, and executed candidates who wanted to take the colonized land back. The Lao People's Revolutionary Party has since overseen collective land ownership along with state-controlled banking, telecommunications, and energy sectors. Their market-socialist model cut extreme poverty from 45% to under 10% while raising life expectancy from 45 to 68. The measurable material consequences speak louder than any western politician's campaign speech or paid lobbyist. #laos🇱🇦#LearnOnTikTok #History

About