Cogdell Law Uncensored
Region: US
Tuesday 30 June 2026 04:30:04 GMT
571180
18207
1236
527
Music
Download
Comments
ViolentDiplomacy :
It’s about defending their rights, not their moral character
2026-06-30 05:54:42
1174
Anime Jane :
that's a lot of words just to say money
2026-06-30 12:38:44
1753
Jerome :
A lawyer doesn’t defend his or her client, he will just execute his rights. That’s all
2026-07-04 04:50:50
2
Mitch 🖤 :
Bc I’m getting paid. Simple.
2026-06-30 05:44:41
350
Gabriel :
For anyone who didn’t understand:
2026-07-01 14:25:36
117
Fart Slave :
This isn't an answer.....Its a moral question, not a legal question.
2026-07-01 13:20:01
50
PoppaBell :
The question was flawed. Let's rephrase it as such: How can lawyers MORALLY defend clients they know are guilty.
2026-06-30 14:05:34
279
Greg Dotson :
He just said the constitution and his wallet are more important than principles
2026-06-30 15:31:00
24
Bostonborn :
It should have just answered money. at least we would respect you a little for that.
2026-06-30 13:57:13
14
Wright2.0 :
The short answer: Money
2026-07-01 01:27:44
46
Apostolis G :
Just answer the question with one word: M O N E Y
2026-07-02 01:04:03
30
Ky :
So basically what he said was “it’s a jury or the judges final decision if they’re guilty therefore I’m shifting the blame and responsibility to them”
2026-07-01 08:34:18
1
jacob :
yeah thats not what that question means lol. the constitution doesnt determine morality.
2026-06-30 19:11:05
5
Ashley Mares582 :
It drives me crazy that this question is always the focus, and prosecutors don’t get questioned about how they can morally prosecute people they know are innocent. It’s also muchhh harder to defend people who are innocent than guilty. I think tv and police procedural have given the general public such a skewed idea of how the justice system really works.
2026-07-02 23:00:07
1
gravity :
but you know he is guilty,
2026-06-30 16:28:47
11
obidenbama2020 :
Better Call Saul 🫵🏻👨🏻⚖️
2026-07-01 17:23:03
0
donkiesjot70 :
I don't think the question was raised in the context of the constitution, but in the context of consience. The question behind the question is: how can a human (yes, lawyers are humans) live with it if another person gets away with a big crime?
2026-07-03 05:18:59
1
Samtaclaus :
If the defendant who is guilty walks free, it is on the prosecution, not the defence.
2026-07-02 22:58:32
1
Ruskikrov :
And from a moral perspective, it’s almost to make sure that a prosecutor presents and wins their case without a shred of doubt and justly.
2026-06-30 08:02:17
10
Dan Morrow :
Sure, but you addressed the constitutional and legal obligations. This is more about a scenario where you’re fairly certain that your client is guilty - in that scenario, doesn’t that give you any kind of concern or regret?
2026-06-30 12:32:28
8
TERRENCE M. CONNORS :
That's a thoughtful question. As an attorney, my role is not to determine whether a client is guilty that responsibility belongs to the court. My duty is to ensure every client receives a fair trial, that their constitutional rights are protected, and that the prosecution proves its case according to the law. I can never mislead the court or present false evidence, but I will vigorously defend my client's legal rights within the bounds of ethics and the law. That's how justice is meant to work.
2026-06-30 10:16:30
19
jimbo jackson :
the anwser is money pure and simple
2026-07-01 20:53:14
22
.. :
People still don’t understand that American justice system is not about whether you are guilty or not. It’s about proving you are guilty.
2026-06-30 13:31:13
5
rajansam47 :
Constitutional obligations outweighs your moral obligations?
2026-06-30 13:20:31
33
Wiley C. :
He didn’t answer the question
2026-06-30 14:26:42
31
To see more videos from user @cogdelllawuncensored, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
