@tgarratt02: But debate with Callum fowler…

JamesO14 :

Declan Rice by a country mile

palmer9501 :

its rice and i aint even a arsenal fan, bruno g is class though

gaahdad :

Both elite at waving their arms at the crowd

Jorg :

Any team in the world would chose rice over Bruno

kieran :

Rice by an absolute mile is better than Bruno G

user.23110314 :

Bruno G. It’s not even close

Owen :

So happy so see Cal getting the attention he deserves, consistent top quality content

FenTekkers :

Bruno G easy

codex957 :

I’m a Newcastle fan and I love Bruno with all my heart but bias aside I’d probs take Declan rice tbh

User :

Bruno. I mean, if you sit yourself down and really think about it critically, Rice is like the Pirlo of Scott McTominay's. He's strong, fit, resilient, running power etc. but there's no guile, agility or elegance there. Bruno is far nicer to watch from a purist point of view. Rice is a McTominay that practices corners a lot.

Ben.gregory100 :

user7137103100913 :

Bruno G is so much better than Rice

Mainy :

Bruno isn’t a better passer than Rice at all, why would anyone think that? Rice is miles clear

Dalee23 :

Bruno G is clear.

Adam Partridge :

bruno better on the ball rice netter off it

Elliott :

Bruno by a mile

Sami :

Bruno g in the final third

jaycuthy :

Bruno

LD :

Declan rice is the best midfielder in the world people get to googly eyed with “tekky” players it’s so annoying

TommyTTalks :

Rice physical monster, Bruno G technically a better football player. Depends what player you want in what system. I’d choose Rice because the technical difference isn’t as big as the physical one

Scott Patterson353 :

Rice better off the ball, Bruno better on the ball

Nathan Peacock :

As a Utd fan, rice is miles better in every metric

BillF :

Both very very overrated but Rice edges it

papematarsarrenthusiast29 :

bruno done better in a worse team tbf