@meghannmcuniff: A company using artificial intelligence to analyze DNA in criminal cases may analyze DNA found under Alex Murdaugh's wife's fingernails under a request from Murdaugh's lawyers. Othram, based in The Woodlands, Texas, tested DNA in the Idaho murders case against Bryan Kohberger, and the company will try to test DNA found under one of Maggie Murdaugh's left fingernail after prosecutors say her husband murdered her and their 22-year-old son, Paul, by shooting them. Murdaugh's lawyers discussed the DNA at his first court appearance today (Monday, June 29) since the South Carolina Supreme Court overturned his 2023 convictions and life sentence in May because of the court clerk's improper comments to jurors about the defense. Murdaugh's second trial is scheduled to begin on April 5, 2027. Murdaugh’s lawyer Jim Griffin said on Monday that he’s asking for testing that “didn’t really exist in 2021.” “In 2021, this genetic genealogy was just on the ground floor. In 2026 we are light years ahead, ahead,” Griffin said. Griffin said Othram “cleared 200 cold cases on behalf of law enforcement around the United States” in 2024. Griffin said the company can work with DNA samples smaller than what can be processed by the FBI’s Combined DNA Index System, or CODIS. “CODIS has 20 data points” while Otham “has half a million data points that they analyze,” Griffin said. Griffin disputed prosecutor Creighton Waters’ description of the issue as a “red herring.” “The DNA sample number 70 that we're asking to be tested, it positively was not Alex Murdaugh’s,” Griffin said. But initial testing said it’s very likely a male’s DNA. “Mr. Waters said there's no evidence of struggle, but there was a shell casing under Maggie Murdaugh's body from the gun that killed her,” Griffin said. “That shell casing and that gun had to be in very close proximity. Maggie Murdaugh's cell phone was missing from the crime scene. Was DNA transferred at that point in time? And so we don't think it's a red herring. We think it's very important.” Judge Debra McCaslin said she wants to know “how long it's going to take to analyze what it is that you're asking for.” “I’d also like to know if there's even a viable sample that they can get, and we will discuss this at our next pretrial,” she said. The next pretrial conference is scheduled for August 14. #law #crime #court

Meghann Cuniff
Meghann Cuniff
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Tuesday 30 June 2026 14:16:53 GMT
28104
342
38
31

Music

Download

Comments

judy.lazarre
Judy Lazarre :
He isn't going to win this.
2026-06-30 16:04:58
22
gen.x_daze
Ash :
Maggie had DNA from an unidentified, not relative that was never tested further. The defense now has that sample in their possession and are having it tested. Yall might get a big surprise.
2026-07-01 03:24:51
6
iceboss_onedon_1
ICEBOSS 🥶 :
there's no way he can get fair jury
2026-06-30 15:06:49
9
jay.bee81
Jay Bee :
I volunteer to be on the jury.
2026-06-30 23:58:54
8
cptsdmommy
CPtsd Mommy :
I hope they will compare samples before testing and I’ll leave it at that.
2026-06-30 18:38:04
7
allisonbkr18
user8347792436389 :
I know he’s a great lawyer, but he needs to practice his speaking.
2026-07-01 23:02:07
2
cincydude2
Ryan Clark :
I really don’t see how he could possibly get a fair trial. It’s going to be real hard to find 12 people in SC that know nothing about this case.
2026-06-30 16:33:17
9
queenshireen90
Queen :
I’m not understanding why they’re putting all this work in. He’s still in prison for his financial crimes.
2026-07-01 19:59:54
2
steve14136
Steven :
he's guilty plain and simple
2026-07-01 02:24:28
3
jess_2733
Jess 🦙 :
Even if it is one piece of evidence that does not prove anything still. Ok so she had dna from someone else under one nail. Annnnndddddd
2026-06-30 16:08:11
1
lizgebke_72
Liz Gebke :
GUILTY
2026-07-01 02:45:38
2
jennibeegood
Jennifer White Boyst :
Smoke show🙄
2026-07-01 03:42:46
1
indecent.rambler
RAMBLER :
Creighton is terrified
2026-07-01 13:03:10
1
emilyrzek
Emily R Zeck :
He wants to test it to find a relatives dna to blame the relative
2026-06-30 22:45:01
1
momulatto
Momulatto :
Is there a reason why the DA standing the entire time?!! Usually they sit during while other party speaks
2026-06-30 19:27:56
1
iamgudpizzanow
༽. Pizza. ༽ :
"clearing" cases doesn't mean anything. if they convict the wrong person, it's still cleared. that's not a good, moral or just goal
2026-06-30 16:49:15
1
angiesmith2321
ASmitty :
At this point I don’t believe he is ever going to get an actual fair trial only bc everyone has seen this case for years now . How is any jury going to walk in and not have their own opinions on this .
2026-07-01 11:31:53
0
To see more videos from user @meghannmcuniff, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About