For Evola paganism was less about reviving ancient rites than about embodying a heroic spiritual orientation expressed through disciplined action. His concern was not primarily with the restoration of pagan religion as such, but with a particular spiritual disposition that he believed had been exemplified by certain pre-Christian civilizations. the qualities he admired, self-mastery, courage, hierarchy, and transcendence through action however were not exclusive to paganism. he occasionally wrote with respect for aspects of early Christianity, particularly where he perceived heroic asceticism, spiritual discipline, or an aristocratic ethos however Evola's critique of Christianity and his affirmation of paganism were primarily philosophical and spiritual rather than historical. He did not reject Christianity because he believed its historical claims had been disproven. Rather, he argued that its dominant spiritual orientation differed fundamentally from the heroic ideal he sought to recover. His rejection of modern neopaganism further demonstrates that his concern was not with resurrecting ancient cults or rituals, but with recovering what he understood to be an enduring spiritual orientation. So yes evola would also be anti pagan in this sense
2026-07-09 12:20:04
1
Xpolski205 :
pragmatism> dogmatism
2026-07-01 06:43:27
5
ANARK :
this is the definition of third position
2026-07-03 22:10:14
1
To see more videos from user @novaketsenatus, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.