@yaa_shikajackline: Which Bank was I pitching for 🤔😃 But hey, me at it again 😊 #everyone #eve

Yaa Shika Jackline
Yaa Shika Jackline
Open In TikTok:
Region: GH
Tuesday 30 June 2026 21:30:04 GMT
303550
14624
658
674

Music

Download

Comments

wisdom.alokam.maz
Wisdom Alokam maziny :
more details please
2026-09-13 21:22:54
0
maamejane2244
maamajane22445 :
how do i apply
2026-09-13 19:16:47
0
kaylixer
kalixer :
She did not say, you are to pay 1k for 3yrs.
2026-07-01 11:24:45
12
paa.willi73
paa willi :
do you know the interest you have to pay within that 3 yrs? It will be equal to the principal
2026-07-01 06:10:33
75
freshmadness
candy man :
I want 4 fourlion dollars
2026-07-01 06:45:40
23
ewequeen70
Cherie Coco :
I am thinking whst she's trying to narrate, after 6 months with 1000 down payment per month (6000) you qualify for 100,000 loan payable in 3yrs.(36 month). What she's not giving us is the monthly payment on the 100k for 3 yrs.
2026-07-02 10:01:56
31
jayfrank58
JAYFRANK 🇬🇭 :
1000×36MONTH that's 3years, totally collectibles is Ghc36000 soo you can't give a loan of 100,000 and monthly payments is 1000 for 3years, it's not possible
2026-07-01 11:12:59
13
yeherzkel
Joel G :
It's a trap, don't go for it
2026-07-01 16:14:12
14
dyhhhwh
JEK :
how do I get intouch with you
2026-07-31 07:02:06
0
kobby.k431
Kobby K :
Pls am interested
2026-07-31 07:08:09
0
gifty.boateng000
MAMA-LIPSTICK :
I need the name of the Bank 🏦 please
2026-07-01 09:09:05
7
justiceantaru
JUSTICE ANTARU :
please am interested
2026-07-01 20:07:18
1
etornam233
𝓑𝓻𝓪 𝓔𝓽𝓸𝓻😎𝓠𝓾𝓪𝓶𝓲 :
which bank is that
2026-07-01 05:58:13
11
boateng.joseph70
Boateng Joseph :
I need some
2026-07-02 05:49:16
1
kingweayooo
Prince k Tulashie :
it's confusing after which period of time she said 3 years and later said it payback period? now calculate paying back 100, 000 by 3 years with instrest included. or
2026-07-01 03:50:26
5
bigsolo978
bigsolo8734 :
any contact
2026-07-01 18:18:02
1
wisdom.alokam.maz
Wisdom Alokam maziny :
interested
2026-09-13 21:22:01
0
aliceakoto
Alicia :
pls am interested
2026-07-01 20:15:01
1
fame4412
fame :
This is what I like most about this type of content ooo u will say all this without mentioning the bank name.
2026-07-01 08:09:18
5
nanabaffour777
NanaBaffourOkogyeaman :
meaning one has to be paying around 3k every month for 3yrs
2026-07-01 06:29:50
5
dkfrimps10
Dk. Frimps :
what if the nature of the business you want to use the loan for start yielding 5years and above ...
2026-08-30 17:34:18
2
rainbowffd
RAINBOW :
am interested
2026-07-05 08:04:59
1
ebenezerofoli
Ebenezer Ofoli :
Am interested
2026-07-02 04:04:03
1
ambassador9754
yabs :
I need a loan
2026-07-05 06:51:44
1
ad34802
AD :
my friend go for 12,000 she pay 360 a month for 3 years
2026-08-29 14:48:51
0
To see more videos from user @yaa_shikajackline, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Graham’s number is one of the most famous examples of an unimaginably large finite number in mathematics. It is not infinity, and it is not the largest number possible. There is no largest finite number, because for any number you can always add 1. What makes Graham’s number special is that it appeared in mathematics, not as a number invented just to sound enormous. It comes from Ramsey theory, a branch of mathematics that studies when patterns become unavoidable inside sufficiently large systems. Graham’s number was used as an upper bound in a problem involving high-dimensional cubes and colored connections between their vertices. That means mathematicians were not saying the exact answer was Graham’s number. They were proving that the answer could not be larger than it. To understand its size, ordinary exponentiation is not enough. Mathematicians use Knuth’s up-arrow notation. One arrow means exponentiation: 3 ↑ 3 = 3³ = 27. Two arrows mean repeated exponentiation: 3 ↑↑ 3 = 3^(3³) = 3²⁷ = 7,625,597,484,987. Three arrows repeat the two-arrow operation, and four arrows repeat the three-arrow operation. Every extra arrow creates a new level of growth far beyond the one before it. The first stage used to define Graham’s number is: G₁ = 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3. Even G₁ is so huge that writing all of its digits is physically impossible. The observable universe contains roughly 10⁸⁰ particles, but that number is insignificant compared with G₁. Then the definition becomes much more extreme. The next stage is: G₂ = 3 ↑^(G₁) 3. This means that instead of four arrows, there are G₁ arrows between the two 3s. G₁ itself was already incomprehensibly huge, and now that entire number is used only to tell us how many arrows the next operation has. Then: G₃ = 3 ↑^(G₂) 3, G₄ = 3 ↑^(G₃) 3, and so on. This recursive process continues until G₆₄. Graham’s number = G₆₄. So Graham’s number is not simply “3 raised to a massive power.” It is not merely a giant tower of exponents either. Each stage uses the previous number to determine the number of arrows in the next stage, meaning the operation itself becomes enormously more powerful each time. A googol is 10¹⁰⁰. A googolplex is 10^(10¹⁰⁰), or 1 followed by a googol zeros. Even a googolplex is absurdly tiny compared with Graham’s number. Despite its size, Graham’s number is finite and precisely defined. It has an exact decimal expansion, a first digit, a last digit, and a definite number of digits. We cannot physically write them down, but a compact symbolic definition can describe a number far larger than anything that could ever be stored physically. Mathematicians can still determine some properties of Graham’s number, including its ending digits, using modular arithmetic. This works because powers often repeat their final digits in predictable cycles. Graham’s number also shows how quickly mathematical growth can escape human intuition. Our brains are comfortable with dozens, thousands, millions, and perhaps billions. Science deals with quantities such as 10²³ molecules or around 10⁸⁰ particles in the observable universe. But higher mathematical operations leave these physical scales behind almost immediately. Graham’s number is far from the largest named finite numbers studied in mathematics. TREE(3), for example, is vastly larger. Values related to the Busy Beaver function eventually exceed numbers generated by every computable function. These examples show that there are entire levels of mathematical growth far beyond Graham’s number. The real importance of Graham’s number is not that it is “the biggest number.” It demonstrates how a simple mathematical definition, built mostly from the number 3, arrows, and recursion, can describe a quantity so enormous that the observable universe becomes useless as a comparison. Yet after all of that, Graham’s number is still one finite integer, and there are infinitely many integers larger than it. #ai #fake #fyp #educationalpurposes #viral
Graham’s number is one of the most famous examples of an unimaginably large finite number in mathematics. It is not infinity, and it is not the largest number possible. There is no largest finite number, because for any number you can always add 1. What makes Graham’s number special is that it appeared in mathematics, not as a number invented just to sound enormous. It comes from Ramsey theory, a branch of mathematics that studies when patterns become unavoidable inside sufficiently large systems. Graham’s number was used as an upper bound in a problem involving high-dimensional cubes and colored connections between their vertices. That means mathematicians were not saying the exact answer was Graham’s number. They were proving that the answer could not be larger than it. To understand its size, ordinary exponentiation is not enough. Mathematicians use Knuth’s up-arrow notation. One arrow means exponentiation: 3 ↑ 3 = 3³ = 27. Two arrows mean repeated exponentiation: 3 ↑↑ 3 = 3^(3³) = 3²⁷ = 7,625,597,484,987. Three arrows repeat the two-arrow operation, and four arrows repeat the three-arrow operation. Every extra arrow creates a new level of growth far beyond the one before it. The first stage used to define Graham’s number is: G₁ = 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3. Even G₁ is so huge that writing all of its digits is physically impossible. The observable universe contains roughly 10⁸⁰ particles, but that number is insignificant compared with G₁. Then the definition becomes much more extreme. The next stage is: G₂ = 3 ↑^(G₁) 3. This means that instead of four arrows, there are G₁ arrows between the two 3s. G₁ itself was already incomprehensibly huge, and now that entire number is used only to tell us how many arrows the next operation has. Then: G₃ = 3 ↑^(G₂) 3, G₄ = 3 ↑^(G₃) 3, and so on. This recursive process continues until G₆₄. Graham’s number = G₆₄. So Graham’s number is not simply “3 raised to a massive power.” It is not merely a giant tower of exponents either. Each stage uses the previous number to determine the number of arrows in the next stage, meaning the operation itself becomes enormously more powerful each time. A googol is 10¹⁰⁰. A googolplex is 10^(10¹⁰⁰), or 1 followed by a googol zeros. Even a googolplex is absurdly tiny compared with Graham’s number. Despite its size, Graham’s number is finite and precisely defined. It has an exact decimal expansion, a first digit, a last digit, and a definite number of digits. We cannot physically write them down, but a compact symbolic definition can describe a number far larger than anything that could ever be stored physically. Mathematicians can still determine some properties of Graham’s number, including its ending digits, using modular arithmetic. This works because powers often repeat their final digits in predictable cycles. Graham’s number also shows how quickly mathematical growth can escape human intuition. Our brains are comfortable with dozens, thousands, millions, and perhaps billions. Science deals with quantities such as 10²³ molecules or around 10⁸⁰ particles in the observable universe. But higher mathematical operations leave these physical scales behind almost immediately. Graham’s number is far from the largest named finite numbers studied in mathematics. TREE(3), for example, is vastly larger. Values related to the Busy Beaver function eventually exceed numbers generated by every computable function. These examples show that there are entire levels of mathematical growth far beyond Graham’s number. The real importance of Graham’s number is not that it is “the biggest number.” It demonstrates how a simple mathematical definition, built mostly from the number 3, arrows, and recursion, can describe a quantity so enormous that the observable universe becomes useless as a comparison. Yet after all of that, Graham’s number is still one finite integer, and there are infinitely many integers larger than it. #ai #fake #fyp #educationalpurposes #viral

About