Joe Redden | Older Millennial
Region: US
Tuesday 30 June 2026 23:02:23 GMT
93693
15003
390
1323
Music
Download
Comments
Pystol❤️🇺🇸❌️ :
Scotus got this one wrong!
2026-06-30 23:43:31
835
Shan_Pastaflocka 🇺🇲 :
Thomas's dissent was spot on
2026-07-01 02:07:56
7
Dez Knuts :
Gonna ignore the very next sentence, huh?
2026-07-01 05:01:20
139
Pman :
SCOTUS really screwed up on this one! It’s plain as day!
2026-07-01 01:15:30
472
theguardianraziel :
Why are we ignoring the part where it says ambassadors or ministers
2026-07-01 00:35:08
99
Rudy_Vegas :
The problem is that was written outside of the Amendment. It needed to have been added directly
2026-07-01 01:42:44
63
Dawn :
Worst decision ever !
2026-07-01 03:13:29
192
Dru :
🤔
2026-07-01 11:16:14
51
Bobby :
nice try but that is not the written part that made it in the Amendment
2026-07-02 19:39:09
5
johnfrangiosa :
And it matters not now, unless Congress intervenes.
2026-07-01 22:01:23
10
Patrick :
Is that part in the constitution?
2026-07-01 02:48:11
31
weeblegrrl :
That’s neither an amendment or anything in the constitution.
2026-07-01 06:03:53
29
babaganush :
SCOTUS clearly did not read the Amendment. 🥺
2026-07-01 17:29:12
45
Teddy :
I agree with you Joe, however, I foresee the argument of “then why wasn’t int IN the amendment?” This whole thing just sucks.
2026-06-30 23:19:23
44
Furyfromthesky1/508th. :
Unfortunately, many parts of this amendment, ( and others) were poorly worded in the final drafts, leaving too much leeway for "varying interpretations".
2026-07-01 00:44:03
50
Double J :
is it in the amendment though 🤔
2026-07-01 04:08:14
22
DarkPrince :
It would help if you read it properly
2026-07-05 03:58:09
12
Jeff :
Why wouldn’t they put that exact wording in there? I agree with everything he said, but why wouldn’t they specify in the amendment?
2026-07-01 11:37:57
8
Kiki8666 :
It was presented to them when they were arguing the case Roberts and Comey ignored it.
2026-07-02 05:05:34
7
dornkladle :
Saying things that people said that were not included in the Amendment means that it wasn’t included on purpose
2026-07-02 06:05:06
7
Ramón | Constitución en Juicio :
SCOTUS also ignored the meaning of subject to the jurisdiction under Wong Kim Ark vs. USA precedent's
2026-07-01 07:43:22
6
Just me :
What it actually reads
2026-07-01 01:09:05
12
Rick :
You’re right.
2026-07-01 00:18:55
27
mother :
Indeed
2026-07-01 00:13:56
17
To see more videos from user @theoldermillennial, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
