Cranial facial analysis is better objectively, but it misses misc features which arent accounted for through bone like nose shape ( Even in well developed skulls) Hairline as shown, ears, lip thickness (Not length), etc
2026-07-03 06:39:42
1
Kay :
im too dumb to understand it but bump
2026-07-01 18:47:20
98
jtjy :
This logically should not be favored over soft tissue analysis because our eyes aren't x ray machines
2026-07-02 23:00:21
8
nepalsecuntra :
water
2026-07-01 18:16:16
27
Blaze :
Sna the most important
2026-07-01 19:22:44
1
ang3lic :
good edit
2026-07-01 18:39:20
37
Kawi :
doesnt everyone do this?
2026-07-01 22:35:45
5
Nds8671 :
I WANTED ABS NOOOO
2026-07-01 19:32:55
4
user747788665 :
more complicated but the same thing
2026-07-01 20:14:34
4
Zirien :
Not too bad ✌️
2026-07-01 21:45:39
5
Lennon :
Does this work for front?
2026-07-02 09:50:09
0
32 :
mirin take
2026-07-01 19:49:10
9
Joseph ✝️ :
is the difference that one is looking at miscellaneous features while the other is looking at side harmony?
2026-07-04 03:22:46
0
тик току в рот срал :
are you trying to say that something can be ideal on craniofacial metrics but side profile analysers will say that its not ideal? or what
2026-07-02 15:59:42
0
Svanten_56 :
Gooner edit
2026-07-02 12:25:06
1
lu_3671 :
SNB : 83.7 degrees and SNA : 76.5 degrees am i cooked
2026-07-02 15:48:19
0
𝗰𝗴𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗽𝗵𝘀 :
Yes 😁
2026-07-01 20:18:19
1
. :
holy
2026-07-02 20:58:58
0
arham_ahmedd :
holy song pull
2026-07-02 12:42:15
0
badr._v :
E-Line, gonial angle
2026-07-02 08:59:06
0
To see more videos from user @eyesfullofascend, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.