@meghannmcuniff: The Massachusetts judge overseeing the wrongful death lawsuit against Karen Read warned attorneys today after protected information released in discovery was posted publicly online. Judge Mark Gildea scheduled the hearing after learning someone shared confidential discovery material on the social media website X 30 minutes after it was emailed to counsel. The information was about Michael Proctor, the former state trooper Read says orchestrated her framing. Gildea, who presides in Plymouth County Superior Court, “ordered that the parties and counsel provide a certification to the court as to all facts known to them as to any dissemination to anyone other than parties and counsel in this matter of any of the contents of the material.” Each of the 32 people who submitted certifications said they didn’t disseminate the information “nor are they aware of any facts regarding the dissemination of the contents of impounded material to any person or entity other than the parties and counsel,” Gildea said. “However, somehow an X account holder, not part of this case, apparently received information that was at least provisionally impoundable. Orders of the court have been violated, either directly or at the very least in spirit,” the judge said. “If these orders are to have any effect, all parties involved must operate with integrity.” Gildea reminded the attorneys of Rule 13C of the Massachusetts court rules, which “imposes a duty on all persons to protect the confidentiality of impounded material.” Rule 3.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct also prohibits lawyers “from making extrajudicial statements that they know or reasonably should know will be disseminated by means of public communication and will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding,” Gildea said. “On cases like this, where all parties involved are aware of the public attention, I expect that everyone is taking every precaution to preserve confidential information, to follow the rules of the court, and to adhere to my orders, because of the disclosure of sensitive private information,” the judge said. “I temporarily stayed further discovery of the non-party. If necessary, I am fully prepared to make such order permanent.” Another hearing is scheduled for July 10. A jury last year acquitted Read of all charges related to the death of her boyfriend, John O’Keefe, who was found dead in the snow outside a home at 34 Fairview Road in Canton, Mass., early on Jan. 29, 2022. Prosecutors say she was drunk when she struck O'Keefe, who was an officer with the Boston Police Department. Read's defense was that Boston Police Department Detective Brian Albert, who owned the home at 34 Fairview, and Brian Higgins, a former agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, killed O'Keefe, and Read was framed as part of a broad Massachusetts law enforcement conspiracy. #law #court #karenread

Meghann Cuniff
Meghann Cuniff
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Wednesday 01 July 2026 21:53:04 GMT
76786
1585
112
40

Music

Download

Comments

taylorhme
Taylor :
This is such a joke.
2026-07-01 23:31:42
84
lizheschel
Liz Heschel :
So what happens now? Proctor really gets out of depo?
2026-07-01 22:56:47
61
stephanierivers29
sendintheBOOM :
Who's Twitter acct did it show up on?
2026-07-01 22:13:37
42
kd2022md
Karie :
What was leaked? I’m late to the meeting
2026-07-02 00:31:36
5
emotionalsupportbabayaga
Jesse J Goodeaux :
Megan is it true Judge Gildea is a codefendant with another judge and Brian Albert in another matter??
2026-07-02 01:36:58
5
cr87086
C R8708 :
Aren't there other people in the court room who could talk? The guy behind the camera, the stenographer, who else is there?
2026-07-01 23:44:33
28
bostonia1986
Bostonia1986 :
Love this judge!!
2026-07-02 02:06:44
3
christinablawson
Christina Lawson :
Something seems off here.
2026-07-02 01:02:54
44
daringdragon3d
GoingBackToEire🇮🇪 :
This could have been an email
2026-07-02 12:27:23
10
tiffanydanielle48
Tiffany Danielle487 :
Nothing has been verified regarding a potential leak. The judge doesn’t appear to have done any due diligence. People can infer based on publicly available docket documents.
2026-07-02 14:12:48
15
mmegan79
💛Mmegan79😜🍌 :
Anyone find the tweet from 2:52pm that matches up with this?!??
2026-07-01 23:32:26
24
danab214
DanaB 214 :
If he’s speaking of proctor
2026-07-02 05:06:41
0
chrissssss201
_Chris_ :
What does this mean exactly?
2026-07-02 01:30:56
0
dhoop83
dhoop83 :
There are so many factors and it could have been a court clerk!
2026-07-02 00:51:37
15
ryanoc12
Ryan :
How convenient
2026-07-02 02:41:16
7
cr8029
cr8029 :
An X account? Who uses X?
2026-07-02 06:22:00
3
longstory_long
Lizzy :
In spirit?!? What tf
2026-07-01 22:33:18
7
andrewjacoby
Andrew Jacoby :
Who leaked
2026-07-02 08:55:18
1
mpppppp21
James :
Does he have certifications from everyone who works at the court?
2026-07-02 00:29:13
2
.msthompson
Shannon Thompson :
Woah!
2026-07-02 01:07:29
1
swipeleft04
24Karat :
Higgins
2026-07-01 23:51:07
1
ptbunum
ptbunum :
What the
2026-07-02 12:45:23
0
freezafsest
Username :
Kinda like “leaks poo”?
2026-07-02 19:46:28
1
wildiamondz
Ceecee :
“Similar” information, so not the information that was impounded, meaning this was a waste of time
2026-07-02 17:26:07
0
lel08116
lellyahesq :
Did he continue the trial?
2026-07-02 02:02:57
0
To see more videos from user @meghannmcuniff, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About