@meghannmcuniff: The Massachusetts judge overseeing the wrongful death lawsuit against Karen Read warned attorneys today after protected information released in discovery was posted publicly online. Judge Mark Gildea scheduled the hearing after learning someone shared confidential discovery material on the social media website X 30 minutes after it was emailed to counsel. The information was about Michael Proctor, the former state trooper Read says orchestrated her framing. Gildea, who presides in Plymouth County Superior Court, “ordered that the parties and counsel provide a certification to the court as to all facts known to them as to any dissemination to anyone other than parties and counsel in this matter of any of the contents of the material.” Each of the 32 people who submitted certifications said they didn’t disseminate the information “nor are they aware of any facts regarding the dissemination of the contents of impounded material to any person or entity other than the parties and counsel,” Gildea said. “However, somehow an X account holder, not part of this case, apparently received information that was at least provisionally impoundable. Orders of the court have been violated, either directly or at the very least in spirit,” the judge said. “If these orders are to have any effect, all parties involved must operate with integrity.” Gildea reminded the attorneys of Rule 13C of the Massachusetts court rules, which “imposes a duty on all persons to protect the confidentiality of impounded material.” Rule 3.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct also prohibits lawyers “from making extrajudicial statements that they know or reasonably should know will be disseminated by means of public communication and will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding,” Gildea said. “On cases like this, where all parties involved are aware of the public attention, I expect that everyone is taking every precaution to preserve confidential information, to follow the rules of the court, and to adhere to my orders, because of the disclosure of sensitive private information,” the judge said. “I temporarily stayed further discovery of the non-party. If necessary, I am fully prepared to make such order permanent.” Another hearing is scheduled for July 10. A jury last year acquitted Read of all charges related to the death of her boyfriend, John O’Keefe, who was found dead in the snow outside a home at 34 Fairview Road in Canton, Mass., early on Jan. 29, 2022. Prosecutors say she was drunk when she struck O'Keefe, who was an officer with the Boston Police Department. Read's defense was that Boston Police Department Detective Brian Albert, who owned the home at 34 Fairview, and Brian Higgins, a former agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, killed O'Keefe, and Read was framed as part of a broad Massachusetts law enforcement conspiracy. #law #court #karenread
Meghann Cuniff
Region: US
Wednesday 01 July 2026 21:53:04 GMT
Music
Download
Comments
Taylor :
This is such a joke.
2026-07-01 23:31:42
84
Liz Heschel :
So what happens now? Proctor really gets out of depo?
2026-07-01 22:56:47
61
sendintheBOOM :
Who's Twitter acct did it show up on?
2026-07-01 22:13:37
42
Karie :
What was leaked? I’m late to the meeting
2026-07-02 00:31:36
5
Jesse J Goodeaux :
Megan is it true Judge Gildea is a codefendant with another judge and Brian Albert in another matter??
2026-07-02 01:36:58
5
C R8708 :
Aren't there other people in the court room who could talk? The guy behind the camera, the stenographer, who else is there?
2026-07-01 23:44:33
28
Bostonia1986 :
Love this judge!!
2026-07-02 02:06:44
3
Christina Lawson :
Something seems off here.
2026-07-02 01:02:54
44
GoingBackToEire🇮🇪 :
This could have been an email
2026-07-02 12:27:23
10
Tiffany Danielle487 :
Nothing has been verified regarding a potential leak. The judge doesn’t appear to have done any due diligence. People can infer based on publicly available docket documents.
2026-07-02 14:12:48
15
💛Mmegan79😜🍌 :
Anyone find the tweet from 2:52pm that matches up with this?!??
2026-07-01 23:32:26
24
DanaB 214 :
If he’s speaking of proctor
2026-07-02 05:06:41
0
_Chris_ :
What does this mean exactly?
2026-07-02 01:30:56
0
dhoop83 :
There are so many factors and it could have been a court clerk!
2026-07-02 00:51:37
15
Ryan :
How convenient
2026-07-02 02:41:16
7
cr8029 :
An X account? Who uses X?
2026-07-02 06:22:00
3
Lizzy :
In spirit?!? What tf
2026-07-01 22:33:18
7
Andrew Jacoby :
Who leaked
2026-07-02 08:55:18
1
James :
Does he have certifications from everyone who works at the court?
2026-07-02 00:29:13
2
Shannon Thompson :
Woah!
2026-07-02 01:07:29
1
24Karat :
Higgins
2026-07-01 23:51:07
1
ptbunum :
What the
2026-07-02 12:45:23
0
Username :
Kinda like “leaks poo”?
2026-07-02 19:46:28
1
Ceecee :
“Similar” information, so not the information that was impounded, meaning this was a waste of time
2026-07-02 17:26:07
0
lellyahesq :
Did he continue the trial?
2026-07-02 02:02:57
0
To see more videos from user @meghannmcuniff, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.