@astuce.sn0: Togue nagne 😭💔#viralvideos #senegaltiktok

M✎ astuce sn✍︎
M✎ astuce sn✍︎
Open In TikTok:
Region: SN
Wednesday 01 July 2026 23:05:34 GMT
5223
545
29
28

Music

Download

Comments

perspicace25
P✪ :
Ce trio ont gâté ce match
2026-07-02 02:17:28
2
user3405673840269bbmaria
mariama camara :
2026-07-02 00:54:03
1
user8236244701780
user8236244701780 :
merci
2026-07-02 02:56:37
0
souleymane.diallo6975
souleymane diallo :
bilahi adamo
2026-07-02 01:50:29
0
ndiayemacon
user2691936137625 :
mérci
2026-07-02 01:55:41
0
user1534882846358
Soda mareme diop :
très bien Adamo
2026-07-02 02:27:16
0
adama.catalan08
adama catalan08 :
tres Bien adamo
2026-07-02 00:35:47
0
machine.de.guerre13
machine de guerre :
sagual pape thiaw
2026-07-02 02:24:44
0
mbonde.lo
Mbonde Lo :
kou merlo bosss enigre
2026-07-02 00:37:02
0
user5731263704739
781026928 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-07-02 03:18:30
0
ibrahimabaldegmail.com
789926390 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-07-02 02:23:52
0
ndeyeastougueye794
ndeyeastougueye794 :
😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
2026-07-02 02:05:52
0
lamineyaffa21
Lamine yaffa :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-07-02 01:51:38
0
lassgueye13
lassgueye807 :
😜😜😜
2026-07-02 01:31:45
0
pedrofortes9321
Jackson :
❤️❤️❤️
2026-07-02 00:33:57
0
lassgueye13
lassgueye807 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-07-02 01:31:42
0
kheucha723
😘Mayare🥷 Diouf🔩💔 :
😁😁😁
2026-07-02 01:28:34
0
mondou.diouf221
mondou diouf221@ :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-07-02 01:08:03
0
tapha.drame17
Tapha Drame :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-07-02 01:05:11
0
amytine44
Cheikou 2007🇸🇳 :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-07-02 00:57:26
0
cheikh.omar121
cheikh Omar :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-07-02 00:53:50
0
lassgueye13
lassgueye807 :
😂😂😂
2026-07-02 01:31:50
0
salihate.a.vie163
salihate a vie :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-07-02 03:25:44
0
amadou.malado2
Amadou Malado Kharitou yayam❤️ :
🥰🥰🥰
2026-07-02 00:05:14
0
To see more videos from user @astuce.sn0, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Dance🫡 #iqmaxx  Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form  a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is  g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if  n = 1  and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if  n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #larp #333 #sinister #dwbi
Dance🫡 #iqmaxx Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #larp #333 #sinister #dwbi

About