@kayleeashlynn: Your tax dollars hard at work #americafirst #christisking #SCOTUS #conservatives #illegalimmigrants

Zach Change :

Should be Elon's tax dollars.

🤷🏻‍♀️ :

Cuthuwu :

luzresto193lucy :

Huh??

Beauty52468 :

zzzinaaa :

So confidently WRONG

Jeremy :

Like Don Jr?

Bri 🖤 :

Me when I’m stupid.

iwnbiwnb :

for those saying she is wrong...how is she wrong?

thehikelist :

No they are not.

Jose Briceno :

You mean your tax dollars.

petorrr rabbit :

im so freakin pissed😡😡😡😡😡

nahshon Holmes :

How come you never question these companies when they get tax dollars from us

D4rk_Pr4etor :

Forgive her Lord

coljr969 :

Who? Where? I like your content and follow you but I need proof of this.

Mountain Goat :

The modern reader consistently misinterprets nineteenth-century texts because our technocratic world has flattened words that were once deeply personal. Today, we view law as a mechanical system of grids and map coordinates, but in the mid-to-late 1800s, legal architects, novelists, and activists all shared an organic, relationship-driven worldview. To a Victorian mind, allegiance was a binding transaction of personal loyalty given in direct exchange for a sovereign's protection. This relationship created an invisible bubble of authority called jurisdiction, which was not a physical border on a map but a political status that followed a person wherever they traveled. This fluid concept of surrendered autonomy was used interchangeably across society, appearing in romantic literature to describe the boundaries of marriage, in activist speeches to challenge the authority of slaveholders, and in foundational legal frameworks. Because our modern, map-based definition of law eventually won out, readers today look backward and project a sterile, geographic meaning onto historical documents, falsely assuming that being subject to a jurisdiction merely meant physically standing inside a territory. By stripping away this personal, extraterritorial nature of allegiance, the modern reader treats old texts like clinical corporate contracts, completely missing how the nineteenth-century mind bound human loyalty, morality, and law into a single, cohesive ideology

m_red131313 :

Propaganda

Child of grace :

🙏🙏🙏

maria :

😡😡

user9928147972064 :

Actually, we’re paying for a president to live in the White House and adding trillions of dollars to the national debt and not getting anything accomplished and starting wars

Kaniman :

Would Jesus approve of this message? Probably not. But let’s be real. Your wear the cross cause is shiny and trendy anyway, not cause you’re a real Christian

Sushi :

Girl! If our American children can’t afford it, what makes you think they can? Be so for real.

Nosy Rosie :

You should go look into how Trump was purposely using one of his hotels in Florida for Russian birthright tourism . Somehow, you don’t care about that. Is it because they’re white? Be honest.

Bridgette Harrington :

How do you think you and your parents and your grandparents became American citizens??? Enlighten us!