disagree about the last being a good argument. "evil" is just the absence or abduction of what is good. Death is evil because life is Good. Good exists therefore evil exists, but not vice versa. Evil is just the absence of Good. God created life but it can not be perfect because perfection only exists in death. this can be explained with the 2nd law of thermodynamics. systems tend towards disorder (evil / destruction). life is order among the disorder (good in an evil system). perfection (absence of evil /disorder) only exists in death of the universe (total disorder / fulfillment of the 2lot) (total disorder is total order) (total good, total evil; heaven and hell)
2026-07-02 14:22:00
14
Giantslayer :
Another thing to consider is that God created logic, so he probably could do something not logically possible, he just A: decides not to and B: being creatures of logic, we couldn’t comprehend it
2026-07-02 13:35:46
11
Chicken Nuggets :
The euthyphro dilemma wasn’t even made for Christian’s, it was made for polytheistic where multiple gods have different wills but there are also moral rules based on the gods will
2026-07-03 15:24:15
1
Lasse Meuter :
I gotta say the allmighty god falacy is often mischarachterised. All it asks is can something do something it cannot do. The obvious answer is it can't do it. All you gotta do is egknowledge that and don't define being allpowerfull as being able to do everything but as having all the possible power or being able to do everything that is real.
2026-07-02 17:39:11
0
barry :
well the paradox of omnipotence was meant to show god has to abide by logic not as a strict refutation of god as a whole so I agree completely if used as a refutation it isn't good to argue definitions though it's important.
if we define god as goodness itself and therefore his will as innately good as well in what way is that different to it's good because god commands it.
divine hiddenness is slightly more complex it goes something like omnibenevolence means god wants a personal relationship with everyone omniscience means god's knows how much evidence people need to believe why does god selectively decide who to give enough evidence still simplified but that's the core of it not just why not undeniable proof.
I wouldn't even say psychological crutch fails reversibility even when it does it's just a generalisation fallacy as a whole anyway lol.
problem of evil is a hard one tbf especially if you bring in things like animal suffering natural disasters ect.
2026-07-02 22:49:14
0
Eyez :
Comparing religious violence to secular atrocities is a false equivalency. Atheism is just a lack of belief due to a lack of evidence. It has no dogmatic belief. So nobody can kill "in the name of atheism." Accusing atheists of rejecting God out of fear of Hell is also circular logic, since you cannot fear a punishment you don’t believe. However, religion does act as a psychological crutch for believers who use faith as a refuge to escape death and oblivion.When 20th century dictators committed mass murder, they did not do it because they lacked a belief in God. They did it to enforce dogmatic political and economic ideologies, like fascism or communism, which functioned as secular religions. In contrast, historical Christian violence like colonial conquest and forced conversions was directly caused by explicit church doctrines and papal decrees meant to subdue non-believers. A communist dictator kills to enforce a political system; a Christian conquistador killed to enforce a religious mandate.
2026-07-02 17:52:17
0
°_° :
Being an all powerful god implies lacking nothing(we all agree this is the muslim, christian and judaist trait of god), then if a god that lacked nothing thus having no desire or need, why would said god even bother creating life or anything at all. (you cannot say boredom because a perfect god cannot be bored)
2026-07-08 03:11:24
0
To see more videos from user @basic.logic8, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.