@jun100018: #cops #police #copsoftiktok #policeoftiktok

KrazyKraftLady :

Influencer are exhausting

TrashTruck :

My name is Elmer j fudd millionaire. I own un manschin and un yacht

kim_bartimus1 :

Never heard of this famous YouTuber 🙄

Thomas :

Social media is the downfall of our society

💗SANDRA💗 :

Why do this just for views ?

jimmy J :

“I’m a multi-millionaire that eats at McDonald’s”

rabbit :

I'm drinking a cold Stella

Shawn 🇺🇸 :

“Do you have nothing better to do?” No it’s literally their job

Da tru playuh :

lIm a multi millionaue😂😂

Rick.mac🇺🇸 :

He is doing his job… so no

JoeGloriatx :

who ?? never heard of him nor do I want to

Julian Adams :

Why do people always ask that question

Dimples254 :

He is protecting and serving

Sam :

who

Chill Gick :

I’m calling Michael 😭😭

ertishon :

Angela :

You can’t disturb other people peace

Carol96367 :

about time camera guys are not entitled 😏

edwardmccarvel :

When is social media gonna stop this nonsense.? I’m so sick of people making money harassing other people.

HONDA FIT KKK :

Good job COPS

jenniferdalo :

Their jokes, oh I’m a you tuber. Who cares

kkid14701 :

A legend in his own mind 🙄

user4171838093294 :

Yelling and using profanity is considered disorderly conduct!

Ehonda :

Omg just follow directions!!!!

oldnavychief85 :

It is so funny that people really think he knows the law. Yes you can take pictures or video tape in public but he is looking for a negative reaction and he wants them to call the Police so he could sue the Police officer that response. These first amendment auditors or so call private journalists are not reporting the news they are creating the news with their actions. We are living in a different time and people are really not aware of the rights to video tape in public, yes it is legal but is the to go and video tape at a Post office, School, Library, Hospital or Court House. They are looking for a negative reaction and they can post that, or when the Police respond they can file a lawsuit. This is not about accountability it is about views and lawsuits. @Ram Siva: Several states have seen legal actions against First Amendment auditors when their conduct crosses into harassment or disorderly behavior, though courts generally protect recording in public spaces. Key examples include: • Arizona: Chauncey Hollingberry was convicted of cyberstalking for targeting an attorney general’s office with harassment campaigns, showing how auditors can face charges when actions go beyond recording. • New York: A journalist sued after being arrested for filming in a police precinct lobby, arguing the department’s recording ban violated state law and his First Amendment rights. • Colorado: Auditors filming voters outside a government building were not cited for disruption, but their confrontational approach raised concerns about intimidating the public. Important Context: • Recording vs. Harassment: While filming in public is protected, auditors may be charged with disorderly conduct or harassment if their actions are deemed disruptive or targeted (e.g., repeated confrontations or threats). • State Variations: Laws differ significantly—some states like California require consent for audio recording, while others are more permissive. Key Takeaway: Auditors must balance their right to record with respect for privacy and local laws. Conduct that goes beyond peaceful documentation—such as targeting individuals or interfering with official duties—can lead to legal consequences.