@ongchuboo68: #chuakimtien

Ông chú Boo
Ông chú Boo
Open In TikTok:
Region: VN
Friday 03 July 2026 08:22:42 GMT
539
76
11
3

Music

Download

Comments

iuchinhnguyen
Chinh Nguyên476 :
Nam mô a di đà phật🙏🙏🙏
2026-07-03 12:33:02
0
vinh.sn.t
tushop11@ :
đẹp quá
2026-07-04 05:17:05
0
ngoc.giau574
🌻kim anh❤️🙈 :
2026-07-05 14:32:45
0
nh.thanh5092
Như Thanh :
Nam mô a di đà Phật
2026-07-04 03:27:03
0
tch.hunh.th
Tách Huỳnh thị :
nam mô a di đà phật 🙏🙏🙏🙏
2026-07-03 13:36:04
0
qunguyn2495
Quinguyenvan :
Nam mô a di đà phật
2026-07-03 22:24:35
0
tuankiethn75
ĐINH TUẤN KIỆT TRƯỜNG CHAY :
NAM MÔ A DI ĐÀ PHẬT 🙏🙏🙏
2026-07-04 00:26:23
0
chi.bao.363668
Chí Bảo :
Nam mô a di đà Phật
2026-07-04 00:21:06
0
nguyenloann7
Tín :
😂😂😂
2026-07-03 13:46:58
0
anhutnuidai
ÚT KHỜ :
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
2026-07-04 13:41:29
0
kiiepnaychoconxllbm
꧁༺😘ALii❤️BiiKa🍀༻꧂ :
con nam mô a Di Đà Phật 🍀🙏🍀
2026-07-03 09:04:12
0
To see more videos from user @ongchuboo68, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Graham's number** is one of the largest numbers ever used in a serious mathematical proof. Named after the mathematician Ronald Graham, it arose in the field of combinatorics—specifically within Ramsey theory—as an upper bound for a problem involving multi-dimensional hypercubes. To help you understand its immense scale, here is a comprehensive breakdown of what Graham's number is, how it is constructed, and why our universe is physically too small to hold it. --- ## 1. The Mathematical Context: Ramsey Theory Graham's number was formulated as an upper bound for a specific problem in **Ramsey theory**, a branch of mathematics that studies the conditions under which order must appear. The problem can be visualized as follows: 1. Imagine an $n$-dimensional hypercube (a cube generalized to $n$ dimensions). 2. Connect all vertices (corners) of this hypercube with lines to create a complete graph. 3. Color every single one of these lines using only two colors: blue or red. 4. **The Question:** What is the smallest value of $n$ (the number of dimensions) such that *every possible coloring* must contain at least one single-colored (monochromatic) complete sub-graph on four coplanar vertices? (In simpler terms, four vertices lying on the same flat plane whose connecting lines are all the same color). Ronald Graham proved that such a number $n$ definitely exists, and he established an upper bound to guarantee it. That upper bound became known as **Graham's number**. While the actual answer to the problem is suspected to be much smaller (mathematicians have since narrowed the lower bound to 13), Graham's number remains famous for its unimaginable size. --- ## 2. Understanding the Notation: Knuth's Up-Arrows Standard scientific notation ($10^n$) completely breaks down when trying to write Graham's number. Even towers of exponents ($10^{10^{10}}$) are utterly useless. To express it, we must use **Knuth's up-arrow notation**, invented by Donald Knuth in 1976 to represent ultra-large arithmetic operations. Let us build up the notation step-by-step: * **Single Arrow ($\uparrow$):** This represents standard exponentiation. $$3 \uparrow 3 = 3^3 = 27$$ * **Double Arrow ($\uparrow\uparrow$):** This represents a
Graham's number** is one of the largest numbers ever used in a serious mathematical proof. Named after the mathematician Ronald Graham, it arose in the field of combinatorics—specifically within Ramsey theory—as an upper bound for a problem involving multi-dimensional hypercubes. To help you understand its immense scale, here is a comprehensive breakdown of what Graham's number is, how it is constructed, and why our universe is physically too small to hold it. --- ## 1. The Mathematical Context: Ramsey Theory Graham's number was formulated as an upper bound for a specific problem in **Ramsey theory**, a branch of mathematics that studies the conditions under which order must appear. The problem can be visualized as follows: 1. Imagine an $n$-dimensional hypercube (a cube generalized to $n$ dimensions). 2. Connect all vertices (corners) of this hypercube with lines to create a complete graph. 3. Color every single one of these lines using only two colors: blue or red. 4. **The Question:** What is the smallest value of $n$ (the number of dimensions) such that *every possible coloring* must contain at least one single-colored (monochromatic) complete sub-graph on four coplanar vertices? (In simpler terms, four vertices lying on the same flat plane whose connecting lines are all the same color). Ronald Graham proved that such a number $n$ definitely exists, and he established an upper bound to guarantee it. That upper bound became known as **Graham's number**. While the actual answer to the problem is suspected to be much smaller (mathematicians have since narrowed the lower bound to 13), Graham's number remains famous for its unimaginable size. --- ## 2. Understanding the Notation: Knuth's Up-Arrows Standard scientific notation ($10^n$) completely breaks down when trying to write Graham's number. Even towers of exponents ($10^{10^{10}}$) are utterly useless. To express it, we must use **Knuth's up-arrow notation**, invented by Donald Knuth in 1976 to represent ultra-large arithmetic operations. Let us build up the notation step-by-step: * **Single Arrow ($\uparrow$):** This represents standard exponentiation. $$3 \uparrow 3 = 3^3 = 27$$ * **Double Arrow ($\uparrow\uparrow$):** This represents a "power tower" of exponents (tetration). The number of 3s in the tower is determined by the number on the right. $$3 \uparrow\uparrow 3 = 3 \uparrow (3 \uparrow 3) = 3^{3^3} = 3^{27} = 7,625,597,484,987$$ * **Triple Arrow ($\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow$):** This creates a tower of power towers (pentation). The height of the previous tower becomes the calculation metric. $$3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3 = 3 \uparrow\uparrow (3 \uparrow\uparrow 3) = 3 \uparrow\uparrow 7,625,597,484,987$$ This means you have a tower of exponents of 3s that is over 7.6 trillion layers tall. This number is already too large to write down in regular digits. --- ## 3. The Construction of Graham's Number Graham's number is constructed using a 64-layer sequence of these up-arrows. Let us define the sequence as $g_n$: ### Layer 1 ($g_1$) The sequence starts with four up-arrows between two 3s. $$g_1 = 3 \uparrow\uparrow\uparrow\uparrow 3$$ This single layer is already an incomprehensibly massive number, far surpassing the total number of atoms in the observable universe. ### Layer 2 ($g_2$) The number of up-arrows in the next layer is determined by the *value* of the previous layer. $$g_2 = 3 \uparrow\dots\dots\dots\uparrow 3 \quad (\text{where the number of arrows is } g_1)$$ ### The 64th Layer ($g_{64}$) This process continues recursively for 64 iterations: $$g_3 = 3 \uparrow\dots\uparrow 3 \quad (\text{with } g_2 \text{ arrows})$$ $$g_4 = 3 \uparrow\dots\uparrow 3 \quad (\text{with } g_3 \text{ arrows})$$ $$\vdots$$ $$G = g_{64} = 3 \uparrow\dots\uparrow 3 \quad (\text{with } g_{63} \text{ arrows})$$ **$G$ (or $g_{64}$) is Graham's #vrilliant #gemmy #targetaudience #juice #gemmy

About