@ovvc357: #audition #fyp

Marty Miguel :

“Leave the courtroom” That doesn’t look like a courtroom 🤔🤔🤔

Sw123 :

Wow that man knows his rights

j :

Judge does not make laws

twin_daddy05 :

This is the way

Rc :

thank you Brother 💯

_10201_ :

This a good one. I need more

J. Borges-Villarreal Esq. :

J. Borges-Villarreal Esq. :

J. Borges-Villarreal Esq. :

oldnavychief85 :

Fake

vickie :

What a jerk

❌N.C.S.W.C…Hooah 🐸 :

Thank you to all 1st amendment auditors! If more Americans exercised their Constitutional rights and audited their public servants, we’d have alot less corruption in our Government

S.R.V :

I have super powers cause I have a camera 📷 I have no formal education yet I call myself a journalist, auditor, lawyer and a law scholar

tash :

corruption 101

Numb2loss :

Finally, “If I’m violating the law, arrest me.” Absolutely perfect!

oldnavychief85 :

It is so funny that people really think he knows the law. Yes you can take pictures or video tape in public but he is looking for a negative reaction and he wants them to call the Police so he could sue the Police officer that response. These first amendment auditors or so call private journalists are not reporting the news they are creating the news with their actions. We are living in a different time and people are really not aware of the rights to video tape in public, yes it is legal but is the to go and video tape at a Post office, School, Library, Hospital or Court House. They are looking for a negative reaction and they can post that, or when the Police respond they can file a lawsuit. This is not about accountability it is about views and lawsuits. @Ram Siva: Several states have seen legal actions against First Amendment auditors when their conduct crosses into harassment or disorderly behavior, though courts generally protect recording in public spaces. Key examples include: • Arizona: Chauncey Hollingberry was convicted of cyberstalking for targeting an attorney general’s office with harassment campaigns, showing how auditors can face charges when actions go beyond recording. • New York: A journalist sued after being arrested for filming in a police precinct lobby, arguing the department’s recording ban violated state law and his First Amendment rights. • Colorado: Auditors filming voters outside a government building were not cited for disruption, but their confrontational approach raised concerns about intimidating the public. Important Context: • Recording vs. Harassment: While filming in public is protected, auditors may be charged with disorderly conduct or harassment if their actions are deemed disruptive or targeted (e.g., repeated confrontations or threats). • State Variations: Laws differ significantly—some states like California require consent for audio recording, while others are more permissive. Key Takeaway: Auditors must balance their right to record with respect for privacy and local laws. Conduct that goes beyond peaceful documentation—such as targeting individuals or interfering with official duties—can lead to legal consequences.

Daniele :

👏👏👏👏👏