@hamo_dolamari1:

hamo_dolamari1
hamo_dolamari1
Open In TikTok:
Region: IQ
Saturday 04 July 2026 18:05:20 GMT
47000
2933
89
447

Music

Download

Comments

ahmad.bazhdar
Ahmad Bazhdar :
مخابن
2026-07-07 10:38:12
1
ramazan.jamal3
كاتم نيية بو كةسي كاتي 🖤 :
2026-07-06 06:36:02
8
ahmmad.surchi90
احــمــد حـاجـی بـرایـم 🌺 :
مخابن🥺
2026-07-06 20:29:56
2
ferzadtatiano
Ferzad Tatiano :
الفاااااتيحة 🤲
2026-07-07 08:11:20
0
barzani4047
🦅Barzani🦅 :
😎
2026-07-07 14:58:24
0
user35652248
حمو كوردي :
2026-07-06 18:11:48
2
userembfqrtlzn
Harki77 :
جوو💔😥💔💔💔
2026-07-05 20:26:54
3
shamalharki7
ŞĦĄMĂŁ ĦĄŘĶĘ :
[صورة]
2026-07-06 18:37:18
1
To see more videos from user @hamo_dolamari1, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Tony! This is a 3D reconstruction of a plaque-mount-preserved baby sauropod. “Tony” is one of the most important of known juvenile sauropods as twas found articulated and mostly complete. Debate over what family of dinosaur it belongs to has transpired. All I see is a diplodocid, the elongate posterior dorsal vertebral centra being ontogeny in action, showing vertebral elongation begins at the sacrum and moves anteriorly. Others have interpreted the elongate centra as belonging to a brachiosaur. The caudal vertebrae are the spitting image of what I would expect an apatosaurine (Apatosaurus proper, or Galeamopus) would look like. Note the strong prespinal laminae with spinozygapophysial laminae being small and secondary to the prspl’s blade. If the cervical neural spines are truly bifurcated then that would eliminate brachiosaurid affinity by definition. Alas, some have suggested bifurcation kicks in later, so a very young diplodocid might not possess bifurcated spines in the cervical or anterior dorsal centra. I asked that this region receive a little more prep so we can convincingly see the spine shapes. This original material and the 3D reconstruction are on display at the @SauriermuseumAathal in Aathal, Switzerland. It is worth visiting to see just this specimen on my opinion :-). How old was a sauropod this small? That depends on how fast it grew. Some have suggested this beast is one or two years old. Histology might give us an age, however in juvenile animals many of our morphological and histological characters aren’t reliable. It hadn’t lived long enough to accumulate seeable LAGs possibly. The lack of neurocentral suture fusion is a proxy character we use to define “juvenile,” and in this case size is warranted, too :-). I mention the latter because that is how island endemism can be inferred, a small animal with fully fused centra. I hope to participate in a re-analysis of this specimen, ideally with CT scans as those should let us see inside the vertebrate to help us tease out its affinities and the impact of ontogeny on oneumatization. #FossilCrates
Tony! This is a 3D reconstruction of a plaque-mount-preserved baby sauropod. “Tony” is one of the most important of known juvenile sauropods as twas found articulated and mostly complete. Debate over what family of dinosaur it belongs to has transpired. All I see is a diplodocid, the elongate posterior dorsal vertebral centra being ontogeny in action, showing vertebral elongation begins at the sacrum and moves anteriorly. Others have interpreted the elongate centra as belonging to a brachiosaur. The caudal vertebrae are the spitting image of what I would expect an apatosaurine (Apatosaurus proper, or Galeamopus) would look like. Note the strong prespinal laminae with spinozygapophysial laminae being small and secondary to the prspl’s blade. If the cervical neural spines are truly bifurcated then that would eliminate brachiosaurid affinity by definition. Alas, some have suggested bifurcation kicks in later, so a very young diplodocid might not possess bifurcated spines in the cervical or anterior dorsal centra. I asked that this region receive a little more prep so we can convincingly see the spine shapes. This original material and the 3D reconstruction are on display at the @SauriermuseumAathal in Aathal, Switzerland. It is worth visiting to see just this specimen on my opinion :-). How old was a sauropod this small? That depends on how fast it grew. Some have suggested this beast is one or two years old. Histology might give us an age, however in juvenile animals many of our morphological and histological characters aren’t reliable. It hadn’t lived long enough to accumulate seeable LAGs possibly. The lack of neurocentral suture fusion is a proxy character we use to define “juvenile,” and in this case size is warranted, too :-). I mention the latter because that is how island endemism can be inferred, a small animal with fully fused centra. I hope to participate in a re-analysis of this specimen, ideally with CT scans as those should let us see inside the vertebrate to help us tease out its affinities and the impact of ontogeny on oneumatization. #FossilCrates

About