@zweback_hd: It’s one of the most controversial VAR decisions of all time but I had no idea what was actually going on so I asked Money Penny (my AI bae) and now everything makes sense! #worldcup #portugal #croatia

Mr. Pop ヅ :

there is no wave sign about the second head touch...cip detected only one touch?

ba0o0 :

You’re using AI for the rules what are we doing. You didn’t you prompt it correctly the AI thinks the header was a deliberate touch when it grazed his hair and teh Portugal touch was the one that impacted ball. Like it’s basic football offsides needs intent and impact of the play his hair touching the ball wasn’t intention and didn’t impact the ball direction. Please watch more ball

Nicolas Flores :

The issue is there's no touch at all, the ball never changes direction from any angle, they could've just synchronized any wave to the "touch" to help Portugal. The ball just rolling on a flat surface makes a shit ton of waves, you're telling me the wind force keeps the line flat like a dead pulse ? Being "so precise"?

Snail :

No, the problem is you’re leaving an entire countries fate at the world cup to a technology that has no evidence of accuracy whatsoever. Fifa has released 0 margin of error, efficacy data, or proof of consistent readings on this technology at all. To overrule a goal by VAR there must be a clear and obvious error. Overruling this goal where there is absolutely 0 evidence of contact that affected the spin, speed, or direction of the ball to the human eye, but due to a sensor that has zero, and I mean ZERO evidence that it can accurately detect true touches (not hair, sweat, or even air pressure) is objectively horrendous for the sport. But sure, let your games be decided by random technology you have no proof works effectively.

Joseph Ayala :

never touched it

starman64l :

Theshow :

The technology is new on its first use. It decided a huge game. we have no idea the chance of failure with this new technology and we don’t know what can trigger it

JT :

Second bump?

InvictusAegis :

It’s simple they have a rule in there for Hair only if the ball Graces a topknot that is considered a touch, you can clearly see the ball does not deflect or change course of whatsoever the ball grays off his hair that was not a touch. I don’t care what that ball sensor did if they need a ball sensor with a microscopic amount of detection level that a human, I can’t see what the fuck even is this game like that’s so ridiculous.

raceengineer91 :

There should be two peaks

Roki :

What if its raining?

user1234 :

Not head, hair

user5432802623810 :

FIFA rules His hair is not part of the body unless it makes an impart. It was offside

RickySuave33 :

Zwe 👀

spralja :

but if it touched his head how didnt it impact movement of the ball?

Timmy Beer :

How come the ball hitting the defender doesn’t reset offside nor read on the machine?

Joseph Ayala :

the graph is the ball bouncing off the back of the defender

hfd :

Even with VAR they still get it wrong 😂

User_756hf69gjg :

1) the chip technology has HIGH margin error 2) NO ball data has been released for entire game. The silly graph shown provides zero confirmation of anything 3) No it grazed his hair, it DID NOT touch his head 4) the defender saw the ball and bent down and it hit his head. This was intentional movement!

Ptnbgr :

O'doyle Rules :

Enjoy your VAR cup this sport is dead

Manlike_Wamwati :

If it is as accurate as to register a touch by a strand of hair, doesn't this mean that even air/wind resistance will def register?....who's to say that spike was indeed the hair?...coulda been a bee for all we know

İṅMůrṭeṛ :

"slightly grazed the portugesse player",he hit it more than matanović

Noa :

so where is vegas touch with the chip technology, it only touch vegas head and they could have just changed that also, that much of a spike of a ball not touching anything but his hair, and hair isnt considered a touch in tbe offside rule, vega was tbe only one that touched the ball, plus the ball doesnt change direction doesnt slow down or anythjng so the goal should have counted, croatia got robbed. Point blank.