니야 Niiya
Region: KR
Tuesday 07 July 2026 13:12:38 GMT
962187
72955
1823
7071
Music
Download
Comments
Gauhar :
We have ATEEZ at home 🤣🤣🤣
2026-07-08 07:32:31
677
빙그레♡ :
2026-07-07 14:10:58
1495
notfound707error :
i was stunned for a second and realized it's ai 😭
2026-07-16 03:27:58
0
ANewBeginning :
Oh em geee
2026-07-18 01:47:27
0
aldrosma :
Loved it!
2026-07-17 15:11:29
0
mahogany :
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰he done good
2026-07-17 23:07:13
0
user8229278592662 :
Locked tf in
2026-07-17 16:17:56
0
Momon21 :
Anaknya mau bantuin . Dan Ternyata d bantu nya pake AI 🤣🤣🤣
2026-07-12 02:27:44
657
しぃ🤫 ✓⃝ :
急に パリパリに踊り出して死んだwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwaiwwww
2026-07-14 12:00:05
162
ゴーータ :
なんでこんな上手いんやwwwwwwww
2026-07-15 16:18:23
32
らんここは生きがい。 :
AIかと思うくらいダンス上手い笑
2026-07-09 05:47:11
913
메이무 :
上手すぎるお父さんwwwww
2026-07-09 02:16:49
493
kokochan961 :
ダンス上手くて笑った
2026-07-12 02:43:21
204
بيرفان بيرفان :
والله ركصة حلوو
2026-07-10 11:33:29
182
سيرة ذاتية - ATS :
قالت له بساعدك ساعدته بالAi 😭😭😭😭😭
2026-07-13 02:52:47
48
🐶 :
Haters gonna say its AI
2026-07-15 03:55:58
0
. :
뚱냥이 아버지 귀여워ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ뱃산이네
2026-07-07 13:16:20
1449
• ̫• :
팔 타신거 넘 기여어여..ㅜㅋㅋ
2026-07-07 13:17:33
470
🍭𝙽𝚊𝚖𝚃𝚊𝚗.🫧 :
แก๊... ชั้นอึ้งจิง อัปปาไม่ธรรมดา..😳 ตอนต้นคลิปไม่ได้เตรียมใจว่าจะเจ๋งขนาดนี้ 😳😳
2026-07-13 12:31:00
62
kutupori :
NYANGKA GA LOO PADAAAAAA 😂😂😂😂😂 ❤️❤️❤️
2026-07-08 10:14:19
209
TEN__10__ :
もうアチズの新メンバーよお父さん！！！wwww
2026-07-10 05:45:18
47
To see more videos from user @gardenofniiya, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![Dance party #iqmaxx (IShowSpeed, KreekCraft, TungTungTungSahur, Gigachad, DrillSgtGrey, Yui Hirasawa, Pepe, Ayumu Kasuga, Xi Jinping, Buddha and Accelerationism) Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #sinister #larp #333 #dwbi](/video/cover/7663142273428753695.webp)
