@themigrantchannel: At today’s Justice and Home Affairs Committee session, UK Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood reiterated the Government’s position on immigration policy, stating that being on a route is not the same as being on a promise to settlement, and that a government can change its rules in order to run its borders effectively. Source: UK Parliament #UKImmigration #Settlement #MigrationPolicy #BorderSecurity #HomeOffice

Razi Malik🇬🇧 :

When people came on skilled worker route the government said clearly on paper they will give ilr after 5 years.. the paper which you received with your brp card.

taymey_bell :

"Route" by definition implies a path to a clear destination. The operating rules and guidelines at onboarding represent a definitive contract and terms regulating all parties to a/the contract. Contract terms are binding, and cannot be altered at the whim of a party to the contract without recourse to all other parties to the contract (the courts are there for this reason to iron things out). Talking about going to work, your employer cannot singlehandedly decide to pay you less than the amount stated in your terms of engagement and expect you to just "get on with it". Government and governance is continuous. Rules can definitely change, but changing them retrospectively stands logic on it's head.

𝐌𝐀𝐑𝐈𝐎 :

Well done lady keep going

🙂 :

Gov.com says that miss

dr_innovation :

cantbelieveitsbutter :

SR. :

Answer: nshdueheuirudhejeoeirujendifudbdifuhdbenrjduduueheehudhehwuejjeushe 🫡

iK :

So you want to control the borders by making it harder for legal immigrants who work and pay taxes?

Zaza :

Strongly disagree with what this lady is saying. This is plain hypocrisy. When people applied for the Skilled Worker route, the government clearly presented it as a settlement route. They told applicants the eligibility requirements, the visa fees, the NHS surcharge, the taxes they would pay, and that after five years of living and working legally in the UK they would be eligible to apply for ILR. People made life-changing decisions based on those rules. They moved their families, built careers, paid taxes, and contributed to the economy in good faith. Now, halfway through, the government is trying to change the goalposts. That is fundamentally unfair and, in my opinion, should be challenged in court. Immigration rules have always changed over time, but historically the Home Office has introduced changes with a clear start date so new applicants know what rules apply to them. Existing applicants were generally assessed under the rules they entered under. This time, the government seems to think it can rewrite the terms for people who have already committed years of their lives to this route. That sets a dangerous precedent and undermines trust in the entire immigration system.

Mani :

talking without logic🤷🤷🤷

Zyan :

Dont say this in court after implementation as judge will explain u more in details 🤭🤭🤭

Mohammed Tanweer :

Blah blah blah

Alistair123 :

she's absolutely right about this matter💯💯

Righteous :

Court is waiting!

DielliArt✨ :

She acts as if it is saying something, but in reality it is not saying anything... being on a route is a promise of settlement...it all depends on whether the person has the desire to follow the route of settlement and whether they meet the criteria

TIKTOK KH4N :

It take a lifetime for some people to become a citizen or get indefinite to leave!! Plus the lifetime saving. Why does it cost €70 to apply for a passport in German but £1600 plus in UK ?

🅴🅽🅻🅸🅶🅷🆃🅴🅽🅼🅴🅽🆃 :

rule changing every third month what a joke

Ade_Omonla :

Your analysis feels chaotic and overly controversial. It overlooks the practical realities for people who were promised a clear path to settlement and entered the UK on that basis. These changes risk undermining trust and fairness for those already on the route.

Sam Mwangi :

The same statement will be true for the same group in the next 5 years as they achieve 10 years. So will the goalpost change again?

timsah :

tooooo much blahhhhh🤔

negii_rajput :

She should resign

faima :

kam153 :

👌