@footballclassics365: 😅😅 what did you think of that cancelled goal for Egypt vs Argentina #argentina #egypt #worldcup #messi #footbal

Emeraude :

My Mexican heart broke for Egypt today. 🇲🇽🇪🇬💔

5k6kz :

I’d rather lose like Egypt than win like Argentina

Thalí 🎀 :

diosanto84 :

Honestly foul or not foul, you give the foul immediately otherwise disallowing a goal like that is just ridicoulous tbf

M :

When Egypt was leading

𝘚𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘤𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 :

Anyone who says Egypts goal was a foul, should say the exact same about Argentinas goal, cuz the same thing was done on both, and I could actually argue the Argentina fouled more than Egypt to get that goal

GIRLS LIKE US :

the refs were being so unfair

A.al_M :

They didn’t even bother checking for a possible penalty before vargentinas 3rd goal

Frank Heffley :

The Disallowed Egypt Goal* • *WHY EGYPT'S GOAL WAS DISALLOWED (VAR APP Rule)* T *The Rule (Attacking Phase Protocol):* Under IFAB rules, VAR mustomieweth sentire attacking sequence leading up to a goal. If the attacking team wins the ball or sustains the attack directly due to an unpunished foul, the goal *cannot* stand. 2 *The Application:* Even though Marwan Attia's foul on Lisandro Martinez happened 100 yards away on the other side of the pitch, Argentina never reclaimed "controlled possession." 3 *The Result:* Because Egypt won the ball directly from that contested challenge, the entire sequence was legally voided. Play had to be pulled back, wiping out Mostafa Ziko's goal. ### , *Message 2: Why Salah's Late Appeal Wasn't Given* * *WHY SALAH'S LATE FOUL WASN'T GIVEN (Defender Won the Ball)* *Playing the Ball First (Law 12):* In football, if a defender successfully wins the ball first in a challenge, subsequent physical contact is rarely given as a foul unless it involves excessive or dangerous force. 2 *Salah Lost Possession:* The Argentine defender successfully stepped across, made contact with the ball, and won the duel. At that exact split second, Salah legally lost the ball, and the defender owned the space. 3 *Incidental Contact:* The physical collision that happened *after* the defender won the ball is viewed by referees as natural momentum (two players moving at high speed). Since it wasn't a reckless trip or shirt pull, it was deemed completely legal. *The VAR Threshold:* Because the referee viewed it as a legal, physical battle on the pitch VAR will not step in. VAR has a very high "clear and obvious error" bar for subjective physical duels and will rarely overrule the on-field ref.

MrBlueSky :

actually a scandal how much Argentina keeps getting away with

Hartvix :

The soft foul was long before the goal. I said it when Egypt scored. Var will find something and they did. Corrupt

lazy asf :

The problem was not the fouls, it was the consistency of the rules being applied. I genuinely believe FIFA is pushing for Argentina.

ramo💋 :

I mean it was foul but the last goal on Argentina should have been cancel, it was clearly a foul