@c7hancn4: Argentina comeback vs Egypt #fyp #argentina vs #egypt #worldcup #comeback

coleman✝️ :

That disallowed goal was a disgrace

Orang asing favoritmu :

FIFA vs Egypt

OKuser219 :

ALL THE CALLS WERE RIGHTIncident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.

ares :

Foul on salah but they don’t go back and review

1lakerpenguin1 :

Someone’s mad 😂

blah :

The referee refusing to look at the var after an obvious penalty!!

صلعه غابريل :

Egypt must've won there were 2 fouls that weren't considered+they canceled a goal

Void :

Not a foul they said

Mergen_cp :

HOW is it rigged can someone debate me, it was a normal march, good comeback.

￴￴￴ ￴￴ ￴￴ ￴￴￴ ￴￴ ￴￴￴ :

Argentinas the goat

_$ᴀʏᴀ⊱܀∘˙ :

when Messi wins it's rigged

°ืิ那亲爱的。。 :

ini nama nya comeback ya guys😂

️ :

Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul. (this is copy paste, no need to ask why, its tiring to do it 1 by 1)

🗣️𝙈𝙖𝙮𝙗𝙚𝙚_𝙉𝙞𝙠𝙖𝙖 :

There were so many fouls but the ref didn’t do anything about it 😭

adlynnn⚡⚡⚡ :

check varrrrrrrr

🌟 :

1KING :

yall are haters