@thehomeofclipss:

s_draber :

FIFA lost its credibility in 2026. What’s the point of VAR still decided by the Referee? VAR should be viewed by and decided by a Panel of Coaches not Referee.

shu n :

unfair game today

Fkcfhllgx :

Fifa vs Egypt

mould :

fifa can't arrange who go to final..it's impossibe😂😂

Saudagar Unta_ 💬 :

man of the match

DWTP Footy :

the ref is french and var so there no way there is bias

kko........ :

semoga Inggrisku tidak di curangi FIFA kalo lawan Argentina pliss😭😭

Peterrainn :

Fifa x 🇦🇷 vs World 🌍 🌏🌎

CALON WALIKOTA BATAM :

Saat 0 1 ketawa Saat 0,,2 bahagia. Saat 1,,2 mulai panik Saat2,,2 mulai gelisah Saat 3,,2 bilang settingan Vamoss🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷

R🪐 :

The comeback was so wild that some fanbase instantly switched to the "Robbed" narrative.

ABDELRAHMAN MOSTAFA :

FIFA, we demand a transparent investigation into the refereeing of the Egypt-Argentina match. The voice of the fans must be heard, because the fans deserve justice, and the national teams deserve a level playing field. If refereeing errors are proven to have affected the outcome of the match, we demand the full application of the regulations and the implementation of appropriate measures according to the laws, because the integrity of football is more important than any result. We will not stop demanding justice and transparency, as the fans have the right to witness a fair and just competition. Football is based on fairness, and if justice is lost, the competition is lost. #JusticeForEgypt #EgyptsRight #ReviewTheMatch

Tin :

Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 3. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 4. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 5. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.

huzzi :

fifa vs egypt

numen :

right losing is rough....makes u pull shii out of thin air😂😂😂

Goodie :