Region: FR
Tuesday 07 July 2026 18:13:59 GMT
184915
38180
646
3247
Music
Download
Comments
Broski_Letsgoski122 :
Egypt and Capoverde:
2026-07-07 22:14:03
3340
rawan :
It was legit 3-1 for Egypt
2026-07-07 18:44:21
2035
Dingaling :
The match bs Argentina was unfair🥺
2026-07-08 07:38:24
1
pat✝️ :
The fact that they cancelled a goal cuz of a foul that happened like 10 mins ago
2026-07-07 22:11:30
363
intp4761 :
capo varde and egypt were genuinely about to break the script
2026-07-08 00:04:28
685
𝙆𝙪𝙧𝙙.𝙖𝙚 :
robbery.... it would have been 4-2 or 3-2
2026-07-07 21:14:22
713
Zakaria :
Playing against argentina is basically playing against fifa
2026-07-07 23:50:07
55
Vortex👾 :
and the team who will inshallah
2026-07-08 00:27:19
26
wajih ashkar :
at this point it's obvious 😞
2026-07-07 23:47:40
24
:
:Incident 1: Disallowing the goal was the correct decision because: 1. VAR intervention was valid: The incident was part of the continuous build-up play leading directly to the goal. According to the rules, VAR has the right to review the phase. 2. It was a foul: The player stamped on Lisandro while he was in possession of the ball. This stamping prevented him from taking a step to run, which constitutes an obstruction of play. Incident 2: No penalty was awarded because: 1. Mo Salah had already lost possession: It was no longer considered an active attacking phase. 2. Alvarez's leg was stationary: It was Mo Salah who initiated the contact by moving his leg into Alvarez. This type of contact is usually only penalized if the moving player is on the attack, but as stated in point 1, Salah had already lost the ball. From another perspective, Salah actually obstructed Alvarez. 3. The contact was extremely minimal: The touch was too light to be considered a foul.
2026-07-08 02:31:01
9
:
ارفعوا تعليقي 🔴 الاتحاد الدولي لكرة القدم، نطالب بفتح تحقيق شفاف في التحكيم الخاص بمباراة مصر والأرجنتين. صوت الجمهور لازم يتسمع، لأن الجماهير تستحق العدالة، والمنتخبات تستحق تكافؤ الفرص. إذا ثبت وجود أخطاء تحكيمية أثرت على نتيجة المباراة، فنطالب بتطبيق اللوائح كاملة واتخاذ الإجراءات المناسبة وفقًا للقوانين، لأن نزاهة كرة القدم أهم من أي نتيجة. لن نتوقف عن المطالبة بالعدالة والشفافية، فحق الجماهير هو مشاهدة منافسة نزيهة وعادلة. كرة القدم تقوم على الإنصاف، وإذا ضاع العدل ضاعت المنافسة. #العدالة_لمصر #حق_مصر #راجعوا_المباراةFIFA, we demand a transparent investigation into the refereeing of the Egypt-Argentina match. The voice of the fans must be heard, because the fans deserve justice, and the national teams deserve a level playing field. If refereeing errors are proven to have affected the outcome of the match, we demand the full application of the regulations and the implementation of appropriate measures according to the laws, because the integrity of football is more important than any result. We will not stop demanding justice and transparency, as the fans have the right to witness a fair and just competition. Football is based on fairness, and if justice is lost, the competition is lost. #JusticeForEgypt #EgyptsRight #ReviewTheMatch ..The Ignored Penalty Appeal: Adding to the fury, Egypt felt they had a clear shout for a late penalty on Mohamed Salah. The referee completely waved it off and the VAR booth didn't even stop play to check it, which immediately led to the counter-attack where Argentina scored.
2026-07-08 04:33:17
5
. :
Egypt didn't lose,no one should say Egypt lost,It was wronged
2026-07-08 01:30:48
10
♡︎シ :
So disappointed 💔
2026-07-08 02:52:30
3
Will :
U know the ref that refer that game was gonna ref the final in 22 but they found out his father was gram argentina
2026-07-08 07:14:35
0
kusaaa13 :
They did so the ref stepped in
2026-07-08 00:11:02
56
Yasin :
It was supposed to be a pen when he tackled mo Salah
2026-07-07 23:24:03
71
ᥫ᭡ :
cabo verde and egypt... switzerland has to win for them
2026-07-07 23:32:05
230
sS!imbata88 :
first it was the Netherlands, then capo verde and now Egypt
2026-07-07 19:10:16
394
𝕲𝖊𝖓𝖊𝖘𝖎𝖘⚽️🙈 :
Imagine being such a good team you swear it’s scripted. But the ref was unfair
2026-07-07 23:59:19
12
Hatred :
in my opinion, Egypt should have won the match. First, Egypt’s second goal should never have been disallowed. The referee let play continue, then VAR went back about 21 seconds to find a foul that happened far away from the goal. Egypt completed several passes after that, so I don’t think it should have been considered part of the same attacking move. If that goal had stood, Egypt would have been 2–0 up. Second, Mohamed Salah appeared to be fouled in the penalty area before Argentina’s winning goal. The referee didn’t award a penalty and VAR didn’t send him to the monitor. If Egypt had received that penalty, they could have scored, and Argentina’s winning attack would never have happened. Third, Hamdi Fathy also had a penalty appeal that I believe deserved at least a VAR review. Instead, play continued immediately, even though VAR had already shown it was willing to review incidents much earlier in Egypt’s attacking move. The biggest issue for me is the inconsistency. VAR went back over 20 seconds to cancel Egypt’s goal, but it didn’t intervene in the same way when Egypt had penalty appeals. To me, that felt like the standard changed depending on which decision benefited. I also think the repeated yellow cards shown to Egyptian players and staff for protesting reflected how frustrated they were with the officiating throughout the match. When I put all of those moments together, I feel Egypt were denied crucial decisions that could have changed the result. If Egypt’s second goal had counted and at least one of the penalty appeals had been given, I believe Egypt would have won the match instead of losing 3–2. That’s why, in my opinion, Egypt deserved to go through.
2026-07-08 01:54:53
22
19 :
you guys say that everyime when argentina comeback against team
2026-07-07 21:38:44
27
To see more videos from user @lks_edts, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
